The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts delineate various purposes of energy consumption of an Australian family, along with the percentage of emissions released from this.
It is obvious that activities related to heating use the most amount of energy. In contrast, the power usage for lighting, refrigeration and other appliances only accounted for a small proportion, but the greenhouse gas exhausts from these activities are considerably high, in comparison with the other figures.
Specifically, the majority of energy is consumed for heating purposes with 42%, while almost a third part of the pie attributes to water heating. On the other hand, cooling consumes the least energy, with only 2%, whereas the power usage of lighting is doubled in compared to that number. As for the remaining figures, the level of power used for refrigeration is less than twice that of other appliances, which stand at 15%.
Simultaneously, the amount of greenhouse gas emitted from water heating hold the top rank, at 32%, followed by heating with 15%. Cooling produces the least emissions, with only 3%. Eventually, the amount of gas emissions from other appliances, refrigeration and lighting takes up to 28%, 14% and 8% sequentially, which nearly twice as high as the amount of power used (as mentioned earlier).
- environment problems facing today's world little ordinary people improve situation government and large companies should responsible for reducing the amount damage 73
- The chart below shows the changes in car ownership in Great Britain between 1961 and 2001 61
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 89
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use
- The charts below show the percentage of men and women in different weight groups in England between 1993 and 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, third, whereas, while, as for, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1076.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22330097087 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92647192216 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553398058252 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.471744307 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.555555556 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151558843109 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658202556045 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617794114152 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111742399397 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634227898322 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.