The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks. Summarizes the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant.
The diagram illustrates the various stages of the production process of carbonated drinks.
Overall, the process has five steps starting with water cleaning and ending with the packaging of the final product to the supermarket.
At the initial stage of the product, raw water is the first step and treated with water softener and chemical to ensure this is clean. At the next stage is heating, evaporation and carbonation, the purified water is pumped with electronic heaters and connected with a cooling pipe. After being heated, the carbon dioxide is passed through by carbonated water to the mixing tank. In addition, the machine has four factors including colouring, syrup and flavor.
As a result, the filter of water creates bottles and then cans them into boxes. Finally, these bottles are packaging and go to the supermarket for sale.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2025-06-23 | Trần Ánh Vy | 36 | view |
2025-06-23 | Trần Ánh Vy | 11 | view |
- Some people find advertisements amusing or annoying and they are not influenced by this when they shop To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Nowadays young people spend too much of their free time in shopping malls Some people fear that this may have negative effects on young people and the society they live in To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- Some people believe that success in sports depends on physical ability Others believe that there are more important factors Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The maps illustrated about the coastal land develops to a coastal park before development and after development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, so, then, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 140.0 196.424390244 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68571428571 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43979062825 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.9743218182 2.65546596893 187% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635714285714 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.4907772941 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.5 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0471700373533 0.215688989381 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0280991843591 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447492116225 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0461472183723 0.15604864568 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050367178633 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.23 8.06136585366 127% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.