The over population of the cane toads in Australia is the subject of concern. Paragraph suggests three reasons to stop the population growth and to destroy cane toads. Where as, lecture discusses about the probability of failure of the procedures mentioned in the paragraph.
Firstly, paragraph states that fencing in the region can prevent the entry of the toads. Contrary to this opinion, lecture says that fencing could work for the large toads but it will fail with young toads and eggs which reside in the water. A river stream can carry toads and their eggs easily to the other side of the fence. These young toads can multiply and establish new population on the other side of the fence.
Secondly, paragraph mentions that toads can be captured easily and can be destroyed voluntarily. Similarly it is more easy to destroy young toads and eggs in water. Disagreeing with this procedure, lecture states that activity for the destruction of toads can also destroy native frogs specially young native frogs which can affect the ecological life.
Thirdly, paragraph shows that scientist has prepared disease causing virus which has been used earlier to avoid in maturing and reproducing of the toads. While, lecture states that this virus is not harmful for native reptiles and other animals but this virus can be transferred along with the reptiles when they are transferring to other locations like America to balance ecological cycle. The effect of transferred virus can affect the native toads of America. This will be disastrous and can affect ecological cycle of America.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 169, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Whereas'?
Suggestion: Whereas
...ation growth and to destroy cane toads. Where as, lecture discusses about the probabilit...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
...asily and can be destroyed voluntarily. Similarly it is more easy to destroy young toads ...
^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'similarly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.259786476868 0.261695866417 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.163701067616 0.158904122519 103% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0818505338078 0.0723426182421 113% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0391459074733 0.0435111971325 90% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0142348754448 0.0277247811725 51% => OK
Prepositions: 0.120996441281 0.128828473217 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0533807829181 0.0370669169778 144% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.49673159131 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0284697508897 0.0208969081088 136% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.103202846975 0.128158765124 81% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0462633451957 0.0158828679856 291% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0249110320285 0.0114777025283 217% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1582.0 1645.83664459 96% => OK
No of words: 260.0 271.125827815 96% => OK
Chars per words: 6.08461538462 6.08160592843 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.361538461538 0.374372842146 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.261538461538 0.287516216867 91% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.184615384615 0.187439937562 98% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.123076923077 0.113142543107 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49673159131 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480769230769 0.539623497131 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 44.9438522706 53.8517498576 83% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0529801325 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.5714285714 21.7502111507 85% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0507858432 49.3711431718 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 132.220823453 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 21.7502111507 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.857142857143 0.878197800319 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 44.7252747253 50.5018328374 89% => OK
Elegance: 2.0 1.90840788429 105% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.665607162574 0.549887131256 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.178944940076 0.142949733639 125% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.101365180611 0.0787303798458 129% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.618291032098 0.631733273073 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.108145079959 0.139662658121 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.320266311705 0.266732575781 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916516705664 0.103435571967 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.458405540746 0.414875509568 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0605190094973 0.0530846634433 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.488068681829 0.40443939384 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0826061398638 0.0528353158467 156% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.62251655629 193% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.