Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most a

Nowadays, advertisements are available far and wide and school advertising is not an exception. While some people think that it will help to develop school budget, the others might argue that school advertising should be prevented because children cannot be treated as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. This essay will be discussing why we can place advertisements in school without destructing educational environment.

Firstly, advertisements, especially ones with positive education content will help children pay more attention to the educational products that are being advertised, and therefore feel more exciting when they are learning. For example, a book publisher should be able to put a book banner which is a visual photo of a boy or a girl who is reading a book in a green park, together with the message “Reading book will help us to build a peaceful world”. Absolutely, this advertisement is a good message that will motivate children to read. Thus, they will have better social knowledge as well as improve their mindset to build a better world.

Secondly, posters which are promoting sports should be an excellent method that can be used to inspire children into a lifelong love of sport. For example, attractive photos of children who are playing football, basketball, swimming, etc. will trigger children to play the games and their physical development will be improved accordingly. Hence, they will have a healthier life as well as relieve stress from studying at school.

In conclusion, we can place the advertisements for both financial and educational purposes. By filtering appropriate advertising content, advertisements are not only the effective funding mechanism but also a channel to extend kids' creative ability.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42028985507 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10610175219 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605072463768 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7322972086 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.076923077 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8461538462 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223406144303 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831098276118 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921906279097 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146025397372 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112670517176 0.056905535591 198% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.