Some people believe that international sporting events are the ideal opportunity to show the world the qualities of the hosting nations. Others believe that these events are mainly a large unjustifiable expense. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
International sporting events were conducted by developed nations usually. Since the advent of new technology, many developing nations are ready to host such competition. The sport enthusiasts believe that it is their opportunity to bring it to the light the qualities of their nations. However, the opposition argue that it is a huge wastage of state’s money. This essay disagrees to the latter statement and the reasons are highlighted below.
It is worth accepting that, the hosting countries of international sport events can expose their qualities to the world. Firstly, they can show that they are able to conduct such a big event in their country. Organizing sport events, for instance, means constructing suitable infrastructure for events as well as accommodation for athletes and their companions. These uphill tasks require engineering expertise and related workers. Thus, by organizing sport event by involving many nations, the host country can show that they have talented workers and are capable to organize big competition. Moreover, many workers from welcoming nation get employment opportunities.
The another pertinent reason is that, the hosting nation can expose its tourist destinations to the world. To cite an example, the participants, their managers and companions need a place to relax before and after their programs. So, in search of relaxation place, they can explore many alluring places of that country. Which will bring a lot of hard currency by attracting many tourists. Additionally, the growing athletes of host country gets an opportunity to learn more about their events by clarifying the doubts from the winners of that competition. It is a golden chance for them gets once in a life time because all of them cannot go to other countries during the sport events.
So, to recapitulate, although the arguers say that organizing international sport events are a large unjustifiable expense, the above discussed points proves that the hosting country can bring their qualities to limelight. It is high time, all the developing nations should get one chance to expose their qualities to the world by conducting international sports competition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 321, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e many alluring places of that country. Which will bring a lot of hard currency by at...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 603, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...a golden chance for them gets once in a life time because all of them cannot go to other ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1851.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41228070175 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01183926304 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523391812865 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5015645538 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4210526316 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.15789473684 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242522622702 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748351304582 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710927579407 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163523311474 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514015973143 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.