I generally believe that both government funding and non government fundings are important for the thrive of arts but since arts should not regarded as a threat to the value of arts government fundings are a must. It is necessary to ensure that arts can flourish and be available to all people.
Arts has its own importance. The rich heritage, the culture of a country is all a part of the art which needs to be preserved. Suppose the Taj Mahal which is one of the seven wonders of the world was built by an emperor but to maintain its beauty is a tedious task. To maintain this beauty government funding plays a very important role.It is for the people and by the people but not everyone has all resources to fund themselves.
If there is funding from the government exhibitions can be held , museums can be set which will be a win-win situation for everyone. Also a nations culture will be able to highlight. For eg- Certain metro cities in India have a setup of markets funded by the government which is highly benificial to the common people and it has seen the rise of many good artists. There are many artists who depend on government funding for their survival as well as for showcasing thier talent.
If I say the Eiffel tower, would its beauty be the same if the government doesnt maintain it? No! If say some person decides to fund on its maintainence how long will he be able to do it? The government knows its people, the kind of maintainence that an art would require; so it is the best that government takes care of the funding. Art improves inviduals, some can make a good wellbeing out of it and it also strengthens the bonds between the people of a nation.
Art in itself is very wide. Art can be paintings, music, monuments, dance anything. So, at the end I would like to say that government funding of arts is necesaary not only to preserve its culture but also because sometimes people are very talented but they do not have the money to fund themselves and exhibit their talent.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...n government fundings are important for the thrive of arts but since arts should not regar...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'regard'
Suggestion: regard
...hrive of arts but since arts should not regarded as a threat to the value of arts govern...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...ent funding plays a very important role.It is for the people and by the people but...
^^
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...m the government exhibitions can be held , museums can be set which will be a win-...
^^
Line 5, column 134, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ll be a win-win situation for everyone. Also a nations culture will be able to highl...
^^^^
Line 7, column 75, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ts beauty be the same if the government doesnt maintain it? No! If say some person dec...
^^^^^^
Line 10, column 29, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ation. Art in itself is very wide. Art can be paintings, music, monuments, dan...
^^^
Line 10, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts is necesaary not only to preserve its culture but also because sometimes peopl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, well, as for, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1649.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 364.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.53021978022 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56364876488 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.480769230769 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3743038568 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4117647059 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41176470588 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.482728528652 0.243740707755 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166484650143 0.0831039109588 200% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114955935425 0.0758088955206 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.303502488698 0.150359130593 202% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147365725359 0.0667264976115 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 12.1639044944 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.