Any recent invention that you think has proved detrimental or beneficial to society?
The role of computers as a recent invention has served mankind astronomically with many people claiming that the advent of the internet has paved way for unreal communication among people. However, I believe that the internet has made people smarter and competitive in this modern world. This essay will further elaborate on both sides and thus, will lead to a logical conclusion.
To begin with, there are many reasons why the internet proves beneficial for our society and the most conspicuous one is that it has provided a medium of instant, easier and effective communication with the people sitting in any corner of the world. For example, the social networking sites like Facebook has made people interact with their long lost friends and relatives. Moreover, the internet has become the language of business, trade, commerce and various fields which augment the knowledge of people and broaden their horizons. Thus, it is apparent why the internet has proved to be a boon to society.
Nevertheless, there are some drawbacks which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of the internet on the people. The most alarming one is that nowadays, people no longer interact face to face with their family or friends and are mostly glued to the screens. For instance, we have often seen people becoming highly dependent on the internet for every job they do in their professional and personal lives. Hence, there is no doubt that the internet has made people more secluded, unsocial and dull.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the impact of the internet is prominent on society although it has some minor drawbacks which can be overlooked when compared with the positives it has offered to humanity.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, for example, for instance, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07665505226 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63684576762 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543554006969 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 460.8 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9621781127 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.416666667 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9166666667 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.83333333333 7.25397266985 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0784813371595 0.242375264174 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0274053484816 0.0925447433944 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459129061041 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0465744363689 0.151781067708 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366429406358 0.0609392437508 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.