agage
In the letter to the editorial, the author has claimed that unmanned missions to space should be opted rather than manned missions. The author states his recommendation by citing the previous success of the unmanned space process and by saying that manned space flight more costly and dangerous. However, the author has taken various vague assumptions to defend his positions which is described in the following three paragraphs.
First of all, the author has claimed that manned space flights are costly and dangerous without providing any evidence or source of the same. It can be very much possible that, in reality the manned space program is carried out very much care with maximum priority given to the safety of the astronauts. Moreover, it highly possible that the cost associated to both manned and unmanned missions are similar with only minor differences because of the safety costs related to the astronauts. Thus, if any of these is true then the argument is highly weaned.
Secondly, the author states that unmanned spaces programs have gathered some great useful information. However, the data gathered by the unmanned mission does not convey that they are bringing superior information as compared to the other. It is very much possible that though the information gathered by unmanned flights are useful, however, they are nothing as compared to the manned flights. Also, if there is any risk associated with sending men and women to space, the eventual results from those steps can be very much useful as they will be able to carry out various experiments in the space which is not possbile in the absence of human. Thus, if any of these hods water then the argument presented by author is highly weakned.
Finally, the claims of spending our resources in unmanned space flight. The author cites this reason by stating that unmanned missions are risk free and can gather informations as well. However, as per the reasons provided above, it can be seen that many of the argument of the author depends on many unwarrented assumptions such that manned misisons can be much superior to unmanned mission leading to the claim of investing the resources in unmanned space flight much weakned.
In conclusion, the author beleive that we should invest our resources in unmanned flight. However, the author's claim is based on several unwarranted assumptions. Thus, although unmanned misisons may seem less dangerous and costly, spending the resources on it is not recommended.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, thus, well, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 13.6137724551 103% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 28.8173652695 101% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 55.5748502994 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2085.0 2260.96107784 92% => OK
No of words: 408.0 441.139720559 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11029411765 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56691376565 2.78398813304 92% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 204.123752495 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.455882352941 0.468620217663 97% => OK
syllable_count: 641.7 705.55239521 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.76447105788 126% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 19.7664670659 91% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.8473053892 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4106630296 57.8364921388 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.833333333 119.503703932 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 23.324526521 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.70786347227 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.218282227539 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0743258471296 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0701772020484 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.128457276422 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0628817314937 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.3799401198 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.3550499002 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 98.500998004 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.1389221557 97% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.