Collectors prize the ancient life-size clay statues of human figures made on Kali Island but have long wondered how Kalinese artists were able to depict bodies with such realistic precision. Since archaeologists have recently discovered molds of human heads and hands on Kali, we can now conclude that the ancient Kalinese artists used molds of actual bodies, not sculpting tools and techniques, to create these statues. This discovery explains why Kalinese miniature statues were abstract and entirely different in style: molds could be used only for life-size sculptures. It also explains why few ancient Kalinese sculpting tools have been found. In light of this discovery, collectors predict that the life-size sculptures will decrease in value while the miniatures increase in value.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered in order to decide whether the prediction and the argument on which it is based are reasonable. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the prediction.
The author of this paragraph has stated that collectors predicts that life-size sculptures will decrease in value due to the discovery of molds of actual body which is not completely agreeable. It is also mentioned that discovery of very few sculpting tools is the reason why kalinese miniature statues are with abstract and different style, completely lacks any evidence. Also the increase in vale of miniature statues is weakly predicted upon these vague ideas which is again debatable. The discovery of two different style of statues and few number of sculpting tools cannot be meddled up to come to a conclusion about the values it holds. The following paragraphs will be supporting my claim.
The life-size statues were claimed to be made out of mold alone is proof-less. Because, in the very first sentence the author mentions about the precision of these statues which, by any means, cannot be achieved with the molds alone. To achieve perfection, intrinsic efforts are always required in artistry. Hence, discarding the values of a creation because of the discovery of only one technique that is used to create it is completely mean. Instead, the technique should be well placed and given more value to the precision of these statues.
Kalinese miniature statues was mentioned to be abstract and different style. Linking the style of creation of a statue with the number of tools discovered is absurd. It cannot be simply concluded that discovery of few paint brushes is the reason why DaVinci painted Monalisa. Similarly, this discovery should not be a deciding factor to the values these statues hold which the collectors are clearly doing.
To sum-up, every archeological discovery has its own reputation and value. Discovery of related things cannot debase the value a item previously held is my opinion. Hence, I disagree with the predictions of the collectors without any prejudice.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 374, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...t style, completely lacks any evidence. Also the increase in vale of miniature statu...
^^^^
Line 1, column 542, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'few numbers'.
Suggestion: few numbers
...y of two different style of statues and few number of sculpting tools cannot be meddled up...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...agraphs will be supporting my claim. The life-size statues were claimed to be ma...
^^^
Line 5, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... style. Linking the style of creation of a statue with the number of tools discov...
^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... related things cannot debase the value a item previously held is my opinion. Hen...
^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'hence', 'if', 'similarly', 'so', 'well']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.247058823529 0.25644967241 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.167647058824 0.15541462614 108% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0823529411765 0.0836205057962 98% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0705882352941 0.0520304965353 136% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0235294117647 0.0272364105082 86% => OK
Prepositions: 0.117647058824 0.125424944231 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0588235294118 0.0416121511921 141% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.72874071889 2.79052419416 98% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0294117647059 0.026700313972 110% => OK
Particles: 0.00294117647059 0.001811407834 162% => OK
Determiners: 0.114705882353 0.113004496875 102% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0235294117647 0.0255425247493 92% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0205882352941 0.0127820249294 161% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1907.0 2731.13054187 70% => OK
No of words: 309.0 446.07635468 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.1715210356 6.12365571057 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.57801047555 92% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.423948220065 0.378187486979 112% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.304207119741 0.287650121315 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.236245954693 0.208842608468 113% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.174757281553 0.135150697306 129% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72874071889 2.79052419416 98% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 207.018472906 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501618122977 0.469332199767 107% => OK
Word variations: 50.4576065497 52.1807786196 97% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.039408867 85% => OK
Sentence length: 18.1764705882 23.2022227129 78% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2169901744 57.7814097925 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.176470588 141.986410481 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1764705882 23.2022227129 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.411764705882 0.724660767414 57% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.14285714286 78% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.58251231527 140% => OK
Readability: 48.5971825623 51.9672348444 94% => OK
Elegance: 1.61797752809 1.8405768891 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236801967138 0.441005458295 54% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0942064012619 0.135418324435 70% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0537146207463 0.0829849096947 65% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.528446106256 0.58762219726 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.134709882363 0.147661913831 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10788708574 0.193483328276 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591812883914 0.0970749176394 61% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.478674717409 0.42659136922 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.11678605939 0.0774707102158 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180794723325 0.312017818177 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387189629274 0.0698173142475 55% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.33743842365 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.87684729064 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.82512315271 62% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 6.46551724138 62% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 5.36822660099 75% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.82389162562 71% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 14.657635468 68% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.