The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment complex to its manager One month ago all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one t
The arguments states that, Sunnyside Tower Complex will increase its profits even more dramatically because the tower complex modified its water flow and also no problems regarding the shower have been reported. Stated in this way, the argument engenders some questions and failed to create some factors, on which it will be evaluated. The conclusion of the argument depends on claims which is further depends on evidence, that is incomplete. Hence, the argument is flawed, incomplete and unconvincing.
Firstly, the argument claims that, all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Tower Complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one third of what it used to be. But, it did not provide anything regarding the water flow, what they are used to be? Then the claims is turn into incomplete mode. For instance, a business firm, says, they are providing best gratuity funds then they were used to be fifteen years ago, but it did not provide what actually they were enjoying 15 years past. The point could have been convincing, if the argument provide sufficient information regarding their previous water flow.
Secondly, the argument assumes that, the change will obviously help them to accumulate a considerable profit as they did not receive too many complaints and they pay for water each month. But, it failed to delineate a comprehensive picture regarding the people’s complaints and pay, what types of complaints they receive? What is their monthly pay? And what is their net profit, after paying, every cost? Is simply, obscure. For example, a corporation says, it has a greater chance to become the first position for the following year as it receives a few customers complains and its net saving is huge, but it deliberately hide the information regarding their survey and their net profits. The point might have been strengthened, if it provides the type of complaints, their profits details.
Thirdly, the argument claims that, although, the change and reading are not available, they have better chance of saving. This sounds like preposterous and not pragmatic, as they had no record of their data, how they could evaluate, that their saving will increase! For example, a business firm says, they are going to get a better response for their product to the following months, but they did not do any survey, any statistics. So, the point, could have been solid and convincing, if it provides assumption on the basis of solid data, statistical analysis.
Posing, several questions unanswered, from building modifications, water flow, change impacts and no data regarding their aspiration of saving increasing. The argument left someone in thinking that, the author is not a discreet in choice and convincing in presentation.
In conclusion, as the argument is failed to answer several important questions and also failed to meet standard argument criteria. As a result, the argument is flawed, unconvincing and failed to attract a discreet reader attention.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 15, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'state'.
Suggestion: state
The arguments states that, Sunnyside Tower Complex will incr...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[5]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'used to being'.
Suggestion: used to being
...regarding the water flow, what they are used to be? Then the claims is turn into incomplet...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'providing the best'.
Suggestion: providing the best
...stance, a business firm, says, they are providing best gratuity funds then they were used to b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[5]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'used to being'.
Suggestion: used to being
...ding best gratuity funds then they were used to be fifteen years ago, but it did not provi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 624, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'hides'?
Suggestion: hides
...net saving is huge, but it deliberately hide the information regarding their survey ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 296, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'say'?
Suggestion: say
... increase! For example, a business firm says, they are going to get a better respons...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.6327345309 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 11.1786427146 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 28.8173652695 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 55.5748502994 79% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 16.3942115768 128% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2537.0 2260.96107784 112% => OK
No of words: 486.0 441.139720559 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22016460905 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76743769743 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 204.123752495 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477366255144 0.468620217663 102% => OK
syllable_count: 758.7 705.55239521 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.96107784431 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 18.0 8.76447105788 205% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 2.70958083832 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 19.7664670659 116% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.4888949411 57.8364921388 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.304347826 119.503703932 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1304347826 23.324526521 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78260869565 5.70786347227 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171661014666 0.218282227539 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493992889365 0.0743258471296 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112230622932 0.0701772020484 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0853416521701 0.128457276422 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855371182366 0.0628817314937 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.3799401198 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.3550499002 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.5979740519 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.32208582834 99% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 98.500998004 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 15, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'state'.
Suggestion: state
The arguments states that, Sunnyside Tower Complex will incr...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[5]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'used to being'.
Suggestion: used to being
...regarding the water flow, what they are used to be? Then the claims is turn into incomplet...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'providing the best'.
Suggestion: providing the best
...stance, a business firm, says, they are providing best gratuity funds then they were used to b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[5]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'used to being'.
Suggestion: used to being
...ding best gratuity funds then they were used to be fifteen years ago, but it did not provi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 624, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'hides'?
Suggestion: hides
...net saving is huge, but it deliberately hide the information regarding their survey ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 296, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'say'?
Suggestion: say
... increase! For example, a business firm says, they are going to get a better respons...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.6327345309 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.9520958084 62% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 11.1786427146 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 45.0 28.8173652695 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 55.5748502994 79% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 16.3942115768 128% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2537.0 2260.96107784 112% => OK
No of words: 486.0 441.139720559 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22016460905 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69525374022 4.56307096286 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76743769743 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 204.123752495 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477366255144 0.468620217663 102% => OK
syllable_count: 758.7 705.55239521 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.96107784431 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 18.0 8.76447105788 205% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 2.70958083832 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 19.7664670659 116% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.8473053892 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.4888949411 57.8364921388 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.304347826 119.503703932 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1304347826 23.324526521 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78260869565 5.70786347227 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.25449101796 114% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.88822355289 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171661014666 0.218282227539 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493992889365 0.0743258471296 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112230622932 0.0701772020484 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0853416521701 0.128457276422 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0855371182366 0.0628817314937 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.3799401198 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.3550499002 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.5979740519 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.32208582834 99% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 98.500998004 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.1389221557 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.