The assumption made is that businesses only prosper having employees that sleep less than 6 hours per night. This assumption should be better analyzed for some reasons.
Firstly, the study in which this conclusion is based might be not very accurate to be used in order to make this assumption. It might be reckless to generalize to the whole business environment a study based only in 300 people. A fallacious perspective might be created since there is a small quantity of people analyzed in the research.
Secondly, the assumption might be based in a research made only with firms that are already successful. In this sense, it would be not possible to evaluate whether a small amount of sleep between executives of a firm affect or not the success of the company. Perhaps the company has already reached success and after it the executives needed more time of work and less hours sleeping to deal with the pressures of the job. In this sense, the company didn’t became successful because employees restricted their sleep time and the conclusion made might be fallacious.
Thirdly, the research is based only in one business segment. In this context, it would be dangerous to generalize it to other businesses fields. In the advertising business it executives and other employees might have different habits and demeanors that might be disparate from other sorts of business. In this sense, it might exist business fields where employees have more than 6 hours of sleep and at the same time their firms still gain a lot of profits.
Thus, one can see that it’s necessary to be cautious with the conclusion that less hours of sleep means more profits in business. The conclusion based in the research might be reinforced by reviewing aspects such as: whether the quantity of people in the research is proper to achieve this conclusion or not; how successful were the firms when the research started with their executives; the consequence to the research the fact that it bases the conclusion stated in a study that involves only firms from the advertising segment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: LESS_DOLLARSMINUTESHOURS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer hours'?
Suggestion: fewer hours
...executives needed more time of work and less hours sleeping to deal with the pressures of ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun hours is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...executives needed more time of work and less hours sleeping to deal with the pressur...
^^^^
Line 7, column 304, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...disparate from other sorts of business. In this sense, it might exist business fie...
^^
Line 9, column 84, Rule ID: LESS_DOLLARSMINUTESHOURS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer hours'?
Suggestion: fewer hours
...to be cautious with the conclusion that less hours of sleep means more profits in business...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 84, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun hours is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...to be cautious with the conclusion that less hours of sleep means more profits in bu...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.6327345309 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.9520958084 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 28.8173652695 97% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 55.5748502994 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 2260.96107784 77% => OK
No of words: 349.0 441.139720559 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98567335244 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.56307096286 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67950749745 2.78398813304 96% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 204.123752495 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.43553008596 0.468620217663 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 527.4 705.55239521 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.76447105788 91% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.4899563384 57.8364921388 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 119.503703932 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2666666667 23.324526521 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.70786347227 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127006768524 0.218282227539 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570448414096 0.0743258471296 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0470663281431 0.0701772020484 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854489159972 0.128457276422 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291824406287 0.0628817314937 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.3799401198 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.3550499002 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.5979740519 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.32208582834 91% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 98.500998004 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.