Here as per the Manager, the restaurant has recently started using margarine instead of butter. As people are not complaining about it, the manager has assumed that customers are happy with the change. Secondly, he is saying that either these customers are not able to distinguish between the margarine or they use the term butter about either of it (butter or margarine).
To support this, he has also provided the fact that, since this change, only 2 % of people have complained,
However, the manager has not provided any more information about this analysis. For example, as mentioned by the manager, the restaurant has recently implemented this change, recently could also mean that they have done this change yesterday only or two days before, we can not reach any conclusion just on the basis of the two day’s data. The point here is that no specific information about the time period has been provided by the author which would strongly support his conclusion. Hence it could be one of the possibilities that only a few people have visited the restaurant. The manager has not even provided the information about the number of people, here I mean 2% of how many people they have considered. it could be possible that only 10 people have visited the restaurant since the change and only 2 people have complained. Hence here, data is not sufficient to conclude that the customers are happy or unsatisfied with the change.
Additionally from the given information, it seems that this conclusion is based on the complaints initiated by the customer, the restaurant has not taken proper feedback from the customers who have visited the restaurant. This gives rise to the possibility that people have noticed the change however, they choose not to complain or say anything about it. Not all customers necessarily complain or give feedback on noticing a change, they just silently move to other better options.
After considering the points, I disagree with the manager's conclusion as it is based on the assumption and insufficient evidence.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 487, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... would strongly support his conclusion. Hence it could be one of the possibilities th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 716, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...f how many people they have considered. it could be possible that only 10 people h...
^^
Line 5, column 837, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ange and only 2 people have complained. Hence here, data is not sufficient to conclud...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...appy or unsatisfied with the change. Additionally from the given information, it seems th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 51, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'managers'' or 'manager's'?
Suggestion: managers'; manager's
...idering the points, I disagree with the managers conclusion as it is based on the assump...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, i mean
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 28.8173652695 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 55.5748502994 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 2260.96107784 76% => OK
No of words: 339.0 441.139720559 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06194690265 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.56307096286 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73215506154 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 204.123752495 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474926253687 0.468620217663 101% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 705.55239521 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.96107784431 181% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2706600982 57.8364921388 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.571428571 119.503703932 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 23.324526521 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.70786347227 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14707034987 0.218282227539 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571031564647 0.0743258471296 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422060240385 0.0701772020484 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0805102472823 0.128457276422 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438349274872 0.0628817314937 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.3799401198 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.5979740519 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.32208582834 94% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 98.500998004 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 487, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... would strongly support his conclusion. Hence it could be one of the possibilities th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 716, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...f how many people they have considered. it could be possible that only 10 people h...
^^
Line 5, column 837, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ange and only 2 people have complained. Hence here, data is not sufficient to conclud...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...appy or unsatisfied with the change. Additionally from the given information, it seems th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 51, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'managers'' or 'manager's'?
Suggestion: managers'; manager's
...idering the points, I disagree with the managers conclusion as it is based on the assump...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, i mean
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 28.8173652695 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 55.5748502994 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 2260.96107784 76% => OK
No of words: 339.0 441.139720559 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06194690265 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.56307096286 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73215506154 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 204.123752495 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474926253687 0.468620217663 101% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 705.55239521 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 4.96107784431 181% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2706600982 57.8364921388 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.571428571 119.503703932 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 23.324526521 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.70786347227 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14707034987 0.218282227539 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0571031564647 0.0743258471296 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422060240385 0.0701772020484 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0805102472823 0.128457276422 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438349274872 0.0628817314937 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.3799401198 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.197005988 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.5979740519 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.32208582834 94% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 98.500998004 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.