The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot

Essay topics:

The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company. "According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actually increased during the past year. Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with the public's lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super Screen should therefore allocate a greater share of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising."

The speaker argues that despite releasing movies with good quality content the count of viewers got reduced, in comparison to previous years, for movies released by Super Screen Movie production company and concludes that Super Screen Movie production company requires more advertising than it currently is. Mentioned or stated arguments and conclusions are decent in cognizance and not at all absurd from the first perspective. But, the lack of geography and social conditions in the given argument indeed creates a coin with a single side. Taking a decision that is affecting the annual budget release from a production company must be prudent. Any decision is said to be wise if the conclusion is the result of thinking from almost all plausible perspectives.
Consider a case where the social conditions of that particular area are adverse in comparison to the previous year, then there will be a decrease in the population viewing. For example, in many states of India, though cinema or movies is considered the most celebrating and popular way of entertainment, there was not a single movie release during the time of the pandemic or not even a single release at the time of demonetization. As the production companies in India foresaw the convolution got a bit secure and procrastinated the releases of the movies. Because of the social situation and as movies are merely considered entertainment and not as necessary the screenings had been delayed.
Also, there is also another case that reduces the number of viewers. On the top of my head, if the good or better content of movies released by that particular production company is unique or likely to be watched by only unconventional people. As an example, there is a production company named Swapna cinemas in Telangana, there is a positive remark, in the youth, on movies released by that corresponding production company because of all crime or civil thrillers and romantic dramas, which are certainly favorite of any logical being. So, analyzing the genre of the movies that are being released by Super Screen Movie production company and not repeating these mistakes in prolonging times will be definitely beneficial.
There are many more reasons, like a surge in the movie ticket prices, dreath of offers in buying tickets, an increase in OTT platforms, etc. In sum, I urge you to be judicious in sensible matters which not only involve economic but also, most importantly, physical and mental efforts. The single idea changes the fate of any organization from nadir to apex and vise-versa, so be as prudent or wise as possible before concluding.

Votes
Average: 5.2 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 764, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...from almost all plausible perspectives. Consider a case where the social conditi...
^^^^
Line 4, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lve economic but also, most importantly, physical and mental efforts. The single ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.6327345309 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.9520958084 23% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 11.1786427146 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 28.8173652695 45% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 55.5748502994 104% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 16.3942115768 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2187.0 2260.96107784 97% => OK
No of words: 430.0 441.139720559 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08604651163 5.12650576532 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88813334594 2.78398813304 104% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 204.123752495 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516279069767 0.468620217663 110% => OK
syllable_count: 715.5 705.55239521 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.22255489022 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 19.7664670659 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.8473053892 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.3461566332 57.8364921388 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.6875 119.503703932 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 23.324526521 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6875 5.70786347227 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.88822355289 44% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268452956131 0.218282227539 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810954769527 0.0743258471296 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723388061297 0.0701772020484 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160984643937 0.128457276422 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.085112159087 0.0628817314937 135% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.3799401198 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.3550499002 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.197005988 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.5979740519 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.32208582834 113% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 98.500998004 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 12.3882235529 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.1389221557 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 7 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 5 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 430 350
No. of Characters: 2143 1500
No. of Different Words: 224 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.554 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.984 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.817 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 171 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 122 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 81 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 57 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 28.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 11.909 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.667 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.319 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.319 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.055 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5