The argument presented here definitely needs to be reevaluated. There are certain possibilities which the argument doesn't consider. In the following passage, we will discuss how the argument can be reevaluated and discuss cases in which it should have been considered to present a particular conclusion.
The argument suggests that there is a "small" possibility that a person will die as a result of inoculation. The previous statement states nothing about how deadly is the cow flu to an infected person. The argument can be divided into two possible cases. The first one is that the probability of a person dying after getting infected by cow flu is much higher than the probability of a person dying after inoculation. This simply means that cow flu is a deadly virus. In this case, the permit for inoculation will be beneficial. This will help to save the lives of more people.
The other case might be that the cow flu is less prone to spread. This might very well explain the argument presented in the essay. This might help save lives because the inoculation might kill people even if in future they would have not gotten the virus luckily better options for inoculations or treatment have been discovered to fight against cow flu.
Therefore, before concluding any argument it should be well examined. The passage presents the cases in which the above argument would strengthen its stand or weaken its stand considering the previous statement's limited information. This might very well be confirmed from the cases of COVID. It was disseminated amongst the people very rapidly and the rate of people dying after getting affected was also too high. So, inoculation became necessary. But in this case, the inoculation itself is killing people and if the if it is not as prone to infecting other people as COVID was it might not be beneficial to provide an inoculation of cow flu.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ertain possibilities which the argument doesnt consider. In the following passage, we ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 37, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... The argument suggests that there is a 'small' possibility that a pe...
^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...y is the cow flu to an infected person. The argument can be divided into two possib...
^^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...can be divided into two possible cases. The first one is that the probability of a ...
^^^
Line 7, column 520, Rule ID: IF_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...ion itself is killing people and if the if it is not as prone to infecting other p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, therefore, well, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 55.5748502994 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 2260.96107784 70% => OK
No of words: 319.0 441.139720559 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97178683386 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80036806518 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 204.123752495 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489028213166 0.468620217663 104% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 705.55239521 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.7486941328 57.8364921388 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4736842105 119.503703932 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7894736842 23.324526521 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.15789473684 5.70786347227 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 6.88822355289 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291755921045 0.218282227539 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093013647087 0.0743258471296 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601626677453 0.0701772020484 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181085017427 0.128457276422 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712992693682 0.0628817314937 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.3799401198 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.3550499002 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.5979740519 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.32208582834 91% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 98.500998004 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ertain possibilities which the argument doesnt consider. In the following passage, we ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 37, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... The argument suggests that there is a 'small' possibility that a pe...
^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...y is the cow flu to an infected person. The argument can be divided into two possib...
^^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...can be divided into two possible cases. The first one is that the probability of a ...
^^^
Line 7, column 520, Rule ID: IF_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...ion itself is killing people and if the if it is not as prone to infecting other p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, therefore, well, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.6327345309 112% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 55.5748502994 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 2260.96107784 70% => OK
No of words: 319.0 441.139720559 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97178683386 5.12650576532 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80036806518 2.78398813304 101% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 204.123752495 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489028213166 0.468620217663 104% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 705.55239521 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59920159681 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.96107784431 141% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.7486941328 57.8364921388 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4736842105 119.503703932 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7894736842 23.324526521 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.15789473684 5.70786347227 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 6.88822355289 189% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291755921045 0.218282227539 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093013647087 0.0743258471296 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601626677453 0.0701772020484 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181085017427 0.128457276422 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712992693682 0.0628817314937 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.3799401198 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.3550499002 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.5979740519 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.32208582834 91% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 98.500998004 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 12.3882235529 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.