Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in area where the disease is detected. However, since there is small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permit inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered.
The author's argument on "not permtting inoculations against cow flu to be routinely administered" is flawed. This is because author used vague or ambiguous words like many, small rather than metioning accurate information but also made conclusion based on sample which does not resemble correct for the entire population. Further more the argument dint specify the areas in which the disease is detected.
Firstly, The use of vague words like many, small in the argument does not support authors conclusion. How many lives could have been saved if inoculations were administered routinely?. How many people lost their life because of inoculations?. The argument should need more evidences here to support the conclusion drawn.
Secondly, The author mentioned sample of people died due to inoculations. What are the nature of sample?. All people who are in the sample are healthful?. There are lot of assumptions on the the nature of sample who dies due to inoculations. The argument should have provided more evidence on the nature of sample.
Lastly, The argument lacks statiscal data on number of people died due to cow flu, their health condition, number of people died due to inoculations, their health condition, and number of areas the disease detected. There is no evidence on when inoculation needs to be administered routinely. With the loss of statistical data, the conclusion made by author seems incorrect.
Finally, The concusion drawn by author not necessarily true, because of lack of statistical data and usage of ambiguous words in the argument.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 5, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
The authors argument on 'not permtting inocula...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...thful?. There are lot of assumptions on the the nature of sample who dies due to inocul...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...thful?. There are lot of assumptions on the the nature of sample who dies due to inocul...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'lastly', 'second', 'secondly', 'so']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.267361111111 0.25644967241 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.163194444444 0.15541462614 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0798611111111 0.0836205057962 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0590277777778 0.0520304965353 113% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0104166666667 0.0272364105082 38% => OK
Prepositions: 0.125 0.125424944231 100% => OK
Participles: 0.0486111111111 0.0416121511921 117% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.96375167651 2.79052419416 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0243055555556 0.026700313972 91% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0833333333333 0.113004496875 74% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0104166666667 0.0255425247493 41% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0277777777778 0.0127820249294 217% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1582.0 2731.13054187 58% => OK
No of words: 250.0 446.07635468 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.328 6.12365571057 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.57801047555 87% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.384 0.378187486979 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.28 0.287650121315 97% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.216 0.208842608468 103% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.16 0.135150697306 118% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96375167651 2.79052419416 106% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 207.018472906 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516 0.469332199767 110% => OK
Word variations: 48.7852908906 52.1807786196 93% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.039408867 80% => OK
Sentence length: 15.625 23.2022227129 67% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6460989983 57.7814097925 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.875 141.986410481 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.625 23.2022227129 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.625 0.724660767414 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.58251231527 84% => OK
Readability: 43.625 51.9672348444 84% => OK
Elegance: 1.89552238806 1.8405768891 103% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.382658759132 0.441005458295 87% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.163065090081 0.135418324435 120% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.122326615516 0.0829849096947 147% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.598558097581 0.58762219726 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.173384001894 0.147661913831 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16248617532 0.193483328276 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561891799417 0.0970749176394 58% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.334979677397 0.42659136922 79% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.033553675628 0.0774707102158 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238299979972 0.312017818177 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631267138667 0.0698173142475 90% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.33743842365 36% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.87684729064 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.82512315271 62% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 6.46551724138 46% => OK
Negative topic words: 10.0 5.36822660099 186% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.82389162562 71% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 14.657635468 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.