The author makes a conclusion that it would be profitable for a seafood restaurant if it would be opened in the Bay City. In order to vindicate the argument, the author cites a study about the increasing consumption of seafood dishes in the past five years. However, the author should provide some other particular evidences in order to support the argument.
Firstly, in the argument, the author mentions that a 30% increase about seafood consumption has happened during the past five years. However, the author maybe overlook some other possible reasons and factors that would also lead to the in...
Subscribe as testbig VIP readers and get unlimited access to essays on the top list.
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 31 15
No. of Words: 558 350
No. of Characters: 2688 1500
No. of Different Words: 198 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.86 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.817 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.542 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 180 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 127 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 86 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 58 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.706 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.581 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.319 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.48 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.13 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'trues'?
Suggestion: trues
...oncern about healthful eating. It maybe true, in some case, that the nationwide stud...
^^^^
Line 4, column 602, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...he city would not a seaside city. Thus, the it may not be very profitable for the rest...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.6327345309 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 31.0 12.9520958084 239% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 11.1786427146 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 13.6137724551 147% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 28.8173652695 90% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 55.5748502994 99% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 16.3942115768 152% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2790.0 2260.96107784 123% => OK
No of words: 556.0 441.139720559 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01798561151 5.12650576532 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.85588840946 4.56307096286 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71022577307 2.78398813304 97% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 204.123752495 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.370503597122 0.468620217663 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 855.9 705.55239521 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 18.0 8.76447105788 205% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.70958083832 185% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 19.7664670659 152% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.8473053892 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.18148458 57.8364921388 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 119.503703932 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 23.324526521 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.70786347227 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.20758483034 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 6.88822355289 131% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.67664670659 192% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196503023179 0.218282227539 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649476383684 0.0743258471296 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753460794291 0.0701772020484 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120669666612 0.128457276422 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660910056762 0.0628817314937 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.3799401198 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.3550499002 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.197005988 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.32208582834 89% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 98.500998004 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 12.3882235529 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.1389221557 83% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.