Some believe that living in small cities provides residents with more peace and health, while big cities lead to a more stressful lifestyle. The author supports this idea with some reasons which are flawed based on the evidences mentioned below.
First of all, this is asserted that the lower rate of sick leaves in Leeville, means the higher level of health amongst work force, whilst this could be resulted from lower employee’s rights in smaller cities. For instance, if a worker gets sick at work in a big city, the manager is responsible to send him/her home, as they might cause harms to the processes while not working efficiently, and if they force the sick person to stay at work, that would be against the rules. Therefore, if the employers of small cities provide their employees with their rights, the number of sick leaves would increase there, as well as big cities.
On the other hand, the lower number of physicians might not show the smaller need for their profession, but would be due to lower number of skilled people in this area. Since most of the educated physicians might prefer to live in a big city rather than a small one, in order to experience a prosperous life with higher level of welfare. Thus accessibility to better services, is the main reason for physicians to choose where to live and work.
In conclusion, although this might be correct that living in a small city is more peaceful and healthier, the above mentioned reasons can not necessarily prove this. As there are lots of different elements involving in this controversial concept and a more standardized research framework should be considered to estimate the influences of various factors.
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 15
No. of Words: 288 350
No. of Characters: 1366 1500
No. of Different Words: 157 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.12 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.743 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.483 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 90 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 60 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 44 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 30 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 28.8 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.25 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.7 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.372 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.654 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.077 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...rous life with higher level of welfare. Thus accessibility to better services, is th...
^^^^
Line 7, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in this controversial concept and a more standardized research framework should b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.6327345309 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 13.6137724551 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 28.8173652695 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 55.5748502994 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 16.3942115768 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1411.0 2260.96107784 62% => OK
No of words: 287.0 441.139720559 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91637630662 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.56307096286 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57633875832 2.78398813304 93% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 204.123752495 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554006968641 0.468620217663 118% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 705.55239521 60% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.70958083832 295% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 19.7664670659 51% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.8473053892 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.429615891 57.8364921388 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.1 119.503703932 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7 23.324526521 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2 5.70786347227 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.25449101796 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.67664670659 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134749302203 0.218282227539 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573971230336 0.0743258471296 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498427710896 0.0701772020484 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.081569418392 0.128457276422 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026020487219 0.0628817314937 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.3799401198 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.3550499002 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.197005988 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.32208582834 101% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 98.500998004 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.1389221557 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.