Main stream media channels tend to reflect issues and disasters more than positive incidents. A group consider this approach as a bad effect for society in general and people in particular. I partly agree with this notion based on some reasons.
From one side, spreading hot news about unpleasant situations may be beneficial to some extent. Firstly, it makes people aware and warned about emergencies and helps them developing a sense of carefulness to prevent them if possible or become ready to face them at the moment of occurrence. For instance, the police shows different crimes on media for educational purposes. Secondly, mass media can attract a great attention and make big contribution to overcome issues and solve problems. An example of this, is the warning news about environmental phenomena which brings people together.
From another side, focusing completely on bad news, can surely cause some major problems to the society well being. One of the results from this, may be threating the sense of safety among people. This would surely lead people to lose their healthy mental state and get suspicious and pessimistic about the world. A clear example of this approach is that they feel unsafe about traveling to third world countries due to the delusion of war or terrorism. Furthermore, bad news report increases the rate of depression and suicide in the society. Hence, some people consciously decide not to follow breaking news. Thus, from my personal stand point, we should take action in order to decrease the influence of bad news.
To sum up, although negative news may have some benefits for society, ultraism would definitely harm the audiences. Therefore, I personally believe it is vital to take balance between broadcasting good and bad news.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to develop' or 'develop'.
Suggestion: to develop; develop
...warned about emergencies and helps them developing a sense of carefulness to prevent them ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thus, well, for instance, in general, in particular, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 4.92783505155 162% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 5.05154639175 238% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 32.9175257732 55% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 26.3917525773 167% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.85567010309 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 937.175257732 159% => OK
No of words: 289.0 206.0 140% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1660899654 4.54256449028 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.78020617076 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66204905858 2.54303337028 105% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 127.690721649 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643598615917 0.622605031667 103% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 290.88556701 160% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.13402061856 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6804123711 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 16.3608247423 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0763733734 44.8134815571 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8235294118 76.5299724578 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 16.8248392259 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.94117647059 4.34317383033 206% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 1.49484536082 669% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.048809425418 0.216113520407 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.01783718703 0.0766984524023 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0238639342448 0.0603063233224 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0336965131011 0.12726935374 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00945346029914 0.0580467560999 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 8.37731958763 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 70.7449484536 77% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 8.71597938144 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 7.59969072165 116% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 41.2886597938 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 8.62886597938 99% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 8.54432989691 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.