People have different views on whether the range of available technologies is increasing the gap between social classes or not. I personally believe that although state-of-the-art technologies are first provided for the rich, in the long run, all society members will take advantage of these advancements.
On one side, if we look back through history, technologies have always been expensive, when they were first introduced to the market. Apparently, affluent people are able to purchase them easily, while the less-privileged may even have difficulty accessing their fundamental needs. To be more precise, people of deprived areas are struggling to provide their families with food and health facilities, let alone buying new devices. For instance, such issues raised when schools were closed and the poor were not able to buy smartphones for their children to attend online classes.
On the other hand, researchers in cooperation with manufacturers, are trying to enhance the scientific and operational abilities in order to produce technologies with cheaper materials and other resources. This will not only benefit companies to reach more profit by lowering the production expenses, but also decreases the final prices for end-users to meet their growing demand for technological enhancements. From my personal standpoint, this is why technology does not make the gap between the rich and the poor bigger, but boosts the level of prosperity among all the society members in the long term.
To sum up, despite the fact that first classes are capable of making use of up-to-date technologies, the big picture represents that the scientific and industrial improvements will also help the middle-classes and the poor to access technology.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, if, look, may, so, while, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48888888889 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06378465399 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644444444444 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.3147353013 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.2 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179220376371 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691143502358 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061529893964 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10433390864 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0702064649452 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.