Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your pos

Some believe that the opinions of experts in a field is much more valuable that the judgments of others. Apparently sometimes there might be argues between people of different expertise about any subject, and the experts of that field might assert that they are more eligible to make judgments in that field. I mostly agree with this notion, although there are some opposite views about this, I will try to elaborate them in this essay.

First of all, experts are the best ones who can make reasonable and rational conclusion about a subject of their expertise, Since they are educated for years in that specific field as well as gaining experience, therefore they are acknowledged with more information than the ones with less expertise, especially in the professional fields, like medicine or engineering. A doctor educates for almost ten years to become eligible for judgments, and goes through a lot of experience as well. Thus not any one other than doctors can make correct judgment based on their limited level of knowledge and experience.

On the other hand, sometimes the ordinary people, or the ones with other expertise, might see a subject from a different perspective, which have never comes to mind of a professional. For instance, once the experts had a problem about a high amount of oil leaked from a ship and soaked on the ocean, and they were not able to collect it, by the time, it got denser and harder to be collected, So the experts asked the public to suggest a solution for this problem, finally two civil engineers could suggest the best advice, they asserted that when a material on the water gets dense, they make it to be solved in water again by using a vibrator! and this was also applied to the dense oil on the ocean. Thereby, talking about professional concepts by nonprofessionals might sometimes be beneficial in some cases.

In conclusion, despite the benefits that non expertise arguments might have, the final decisions about professional subject, should be made by the experts. Since they are the most acknowledged and experienced ones in that specific field, although they might be better to make use of the non professionals, in order to think outside the box of their routine approaches.

Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus, through a lot of experience as well. Thus not any one other than doctors can make...
Line 5, column 647, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...ved in water again by using a vibrator! and this was also applied to the dense oil ...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, finally, first, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, talking about, as well as, first of all, in some cases, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1862.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 378.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92592592593 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73124542583 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526455026455 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 593.1 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 23.0359550562 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 123.669915234 60.3974514979 205% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 169.272727273 118.986275619 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.3636363636 23.4991977007 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.1818181818 5.21951772744 291% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115623991513 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502305633357 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443222212571 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0740819195368 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043143792848 0.0667264976115 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 14.1392134831 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.97 48.8420337079 76% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 12.1743820225 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 11.2143820225 139% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.