Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the

Essay topics:

Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Is Critical judgement of work in a given topic has almost no value unless it comes from an expert? I do not think so, it could have a value. However, most of them is in fact uselsss due to that most of non-experts do not understand what they did, and how to deal with their problems. I think, undergraduate-level backgrounds are necessary to make a critical judgement.
I agree that most opinions coming from non-experts are useless. This is because, non-experts usually lacks the understanding on precise definition about what they would do and tools they will use. Therefore, they just make useless judgements about problems, or work out for misunderstood problems. Various pseudoscientists and pseudomathematicians would be examples: most of them have no proper understanding about problems they discussed: I have seen a person, who argues he proved Riemann hypothesis. However, he could not even say the precise statement of Riemann hypothesis. Even more, his understanding on calculus and algebra is totally broken: mistakes he made was so elementary that even sophomore could point it out.
However, I also think that non-experts could give a new insightful work: to be an expert requires learning gigantic amount of knowledge, and unfortunately, most experts choose to being rigid; they tend to not divert from the precise and known information, because it is an easy way to digest huge amount of knowledge. Therefore, non-experts sometimes show more illuminating ideas than experts. For example, I have heard from an aquaintence about sociology class. Both undergraduate students and graduate students take this class, and interestingly, the undergraduates tend to suggest more creative and maverick ideas than the graduates. She pointed out that undergraduates are not poured into deep knowledge about sociology, so they could not restrict themselves into previous discussions in sociology.
There is a possible opposition about the previous example: undergraduates of sociology are not experts, but they learns sociology, so they are relatively "more" experts than non-sociology majors. This is true, I cannot deny, and I think who can make useful critical judgement should have undergradute-level backgrounds: though undergraduates do not learn how to study, they learn how to understand the thesis and knowledges of their field. Therefore, the chance for misunderstanding their problem or using tools poorly is low for them. Let me explain about pseudomathematicians again: All pseudomathematicians I have seen do not majors mathematics. Moreover, majors I have seen do not do pseudomathematics, even though they sometimes shows weak understaing on their major. They learned that why pop pseudomathematics are wrong, and they understood at least the statement of problems, usually targetted by pseudomathematicians. As a result, they did not make fake proofs or wrong arguments.

Votes
Average: 6.8 (2 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'learn'
Suggestion: learn
... of sociology are not experts, but they learns sociology, so they are relatively &apos...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 595, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xplain about pseudomathematicians again: All pseudomathematicians I have seen do ...
^^
Line 4, column 641, Rule ID: DONT_NEEDS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'major'?
Suggestion: major
...pseudomathematicians I have seen do not majors mathematics. Moreover, majors I have se...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 746, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'show'
Suggestion: show
...mathematics, even though they sometimes shows weak understaing on their major. They l...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, so, therefore, at least, even so, for example, i think, in fact, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2457.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 447.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4966442953 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.60015664619 2.79657885939 129% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532438478747 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 754.2 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 6.24550561798 272% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.8385986666 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.681818182 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3181818182 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121798179042 0.243740707755 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438429078697 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594198247181 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0888088275955 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0370502949715 0.0667264976115 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.