Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the

Critical judgement is defined as the qualified evaluation and criticism of a certain activity. It is really important for properly understanding the feasibility and finding loopholes in something. The prose however, suggests that critical judgement of work in any given field has frivolous value unless it is coming from an expert in that field. I stand in partial support of the of given statement for the following reasons.
Expert means a person with adequate knowledge and experience in a certain work of an area. They tend to possess a command over the subject matter and understand everything in detail. To criticise and deliver judgements on any activity, one has to possess sufficient knowledge and experience in that field. For instance, A new invention about increasing the harvest by applying a pesticide is advanced by a group of researchers. That pesticide is shown to be very effective in eradicating the pestilence of the crops, however, the experts on this field might find out that the chemical being proposed also depletes soil from nytrogen, an element really necessary for the production of crops. Without expertise, a lay-man can’t discern whether a chemical used in the field for better production will ultimately yield its desired benefit or not. However, knowledgable and experienced individual can immediately find out the flaws as they are sufficient understanding of the topic as evident on the scenario described above. So, without adequated acumen in any field, presenting a convincing critical judgement is not possible. Moreover, criticising any thing for sake of criticisng is an easy task but to find a solution to the problem needs lucid understanding.

Critical judgement has two important parts, first two find the fault or limitation and then to explain how the limitation can be overcome. However, people with some knowledge can find fault of a work or study, but to explicate the necessary measures for mitigating that fault or limitation is beyond the capacity of those critics. A mechanic can find the faulty parts of a car by assaying the malfunction of cetain parts of the engine but to explain the reason why that part is failing and why that engine design is not feasible is not within the boundary of his knowledge. It needs intervention from an engineer or a designer who has expertise on that field. To, provide a critical judgement a substantial amount of insights is necessary.
However, experts in certain field have predilection for specific interest and they seldom have an impartial view on works. They get biased because of their previous knowledge and stance on a certain issue. Furthermore, a set of rules and principles guild the scope of work in any given field and these experts always tend to think within the conventional methods which can sometimes be a hindrance towards an invention. For instance, when Einstein invented his famous equation E=MC2, he first submitted this scholarly study to the university professor and was this idea was flouted by the professor as it was incongruous with the established methods then. However, this equation later became one of the most fundamental and significant invention of modern physics and now unanimously certified as an ingenious finding by the famous scientist. Point is, because of the boundary set by the norms and standards, some ingenious ideas doesn’t get the recognition they deserve and this sort of critical judgements can be detrimental.
Based on these aforementioned factors it can be said that although, it’s not possible to provide critical judgement on any area without expertise, sometimes the conventional methods which restricts these experts within a boundary, may deter significant discovery and be deleterious for a field.

Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 322, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...perience in that field. For instance, A new invention about increasing the harvest by applyin...
Line 2, column 1146, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
Suggestion: anything
... is not possible. Moreover, criticising any thing for sake of criticisng is an easy task...
Line 2, column 1181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...sing any thing for sake of criticisng is an easy task but to find a solution to t...
Line 6, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion: said that although, it’s not possible to provide critical judgement on any are...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, then, as to, for instance, sort of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 12.9106741573 232% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3164.0 2235.4752809 142% => OK
No of words: 605.0 442.535393258 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22975206612 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.95951083803 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.966806323 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 291.0 215.323595506 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480991735537 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 992.7 704.065955056 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7786500338 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.56 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255117308085 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749348201919 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761999214509 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15940599269 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0658519942424 0.0667264976115 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 157.0 100.480337079 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?


Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.