Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
I strongly agree that every power in any field have to step down after 5 years. During replacing the power, many groups conflicts; it helps to reflect various voices from variuos groups into a field. Moreover, by underlining every power will be step down, they will not stick to the power so they will be more precarious on their field and especially not hide a problem in their field.
Firstly, Changing the head of a field periodically can lead to a balance between partisans: it sounds like not beneficial, as conflict between two or more parties consumes time, energy and costs. However, it also mean a variety of opinions can be represented in a field: by reflecting various voices from different groups, we can fix problems which cannot be caughted under a single perspective. For example, discriminations and biases against women was not emphasized until women have given an economic, social, scientific and literary attribution. By getting a share from each fields, women can represent themselves and their identities, and it have diminishing prevalent misogyny in our society.
As mentioned, however, conflicts between groups takes a cost. I think, however, it does not mean just sticking one perspective and not changing a head does not leads us to economic efficiency: they overshadows various problems they could not see, or they do not want to see, and it sometimes causes more serious problem, which can be noticed if various views are allowed.
Moreover, letting individuals into a perpetuating power makes them to be "rotten": even if they find a prevalent and serious inherent problems in their field, they could not fix it if they think it threatens their power. They forgot their original ideal, and they just stick to their power so that they do everything for their power, including not fixing inherent problems of their field - I will call this status "rotten". If they know they have to step down eventually, however, keeping the problem is less advantageous for them, so a chance of fixing a problem is improved.
Some opponents presents People Republic of China and Singapore as a counterexample: they have unchanged, ideal leaders so that they brings their society a dramatic economical development. However, do these countries really not "rotten"? I think not. The new coronavirus outbreak, starting from Wuhan, disproves their argument. There are doctors who warns this coronavirus, but the authority ignores and suppresses the whistleblowers, as it might cause social disturbance. The cost is, thousands of deaths including one whistleblowing doctor.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 214, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'means'?
Suggestion: means
...ime, energy and costs. However, it also mean a variety of opinions can be represente...
^^^^
Line 2, column 648, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...themselves and their identities, and it have diminishing prevalent misogyny in our s...
^^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...ective and not changing a head does not leads us to economic efficiency: they oversha...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'overshadow'
Suggestion: overshadow
...t leads us to economic efficiency: they overshadows various problems they could not see, or...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 17, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'present'.
Suggestion: present
...a problem is improved. Some opponents presents People Republic of China and Singapore ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 134, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'bring'
Suggestion: bring
...e unchanged, ideal leaders so that they brings their society a dramatic economical dev...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...at they brings their society a dramatic economical development. However, do these countrie...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, really, so, for example, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2196.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 417.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26618705036 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1084942752 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549160671463 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 660.6 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.7893120631 60.3974514979 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0905982820637 0.243740707755 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0342806930314 0.0831039109588 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526065995575 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0552127270559 0.150359130593 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554063341214 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.