A tv station s business manager proposes to increase time of local news and weather news in late night news for some reasons

Essay topics:

A tv station's business manager proposes to increase time of local news and weather news in late night news for some reasons.

The time devoted to national news in the late-night new programs should be diminished while the time devoted to weather and local news should be increased and the reasons in the following paragraphs will back up my claim.

People who stay up at night to watch the late-night news program do not want to be disappointed by the late-night program giving the national news more viewing time than the weather and local news. Instead, it should be done in proportion i.e. equal time for both national news and weather and local news. This discouragement can have an adverse effect in the revenue the television station pulls through advertising contracts being pulled back. In order for the television station to continually be up and running, it needs these advertising contracts and adjusting the viewing time by restoring the time used for weather and local news to its original level.

Secondly, preference should not be shown to national news by giving it more viewing time at the expense of weather and local news. People want to know about the weather and how it might affect their movements the coming day, week or even months and also about what is happening around them locally in order to be aware of the latest happenings in thier immediate enviroments as much as they want to know about what is going on in the nation as a whole. For this to happen, the time allocated to weather and local news should be as proportional as possible to the time allocated to the national news.

In conclusion, during the late-night news program, proportionality should be showed when allocating time for the national news and the weather and local news in order for the television station not to lose their late-night viewers completely.

Votes
Average: 5 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 11.1786427146 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 13.6137724551 15% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 28.8173652695 49% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 55.5748502994 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 2260.96107784 64% => OK
No of words: 295.0 441.139720559 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90508474576 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66008620233 2.78398813304 96% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 204.123752495 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447457627119 0.468620217663 95% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 705.55239521 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 19.7664670659 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.8473053892 140% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.6584249077 57.8364921388 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.777777778 119.503703932 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.7777777778 23.324526521 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.70786347227 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.478148975624 0.218282227539 219% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.27462267031 0.0743258471296 369% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14251201733 0.0701772020484 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.368304593766 0.128457276422 287% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811686771341 0.0628817314937 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 14.3799401198 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 48.3550499002 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.197005988 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 98.500998004 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.1389221557 133% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 11.1786427146 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 13.6137724551 15% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 28.8173652695 49% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 55.5748502994 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 2260.96107784 64% => OK
No of words: 295.0 441.139720559 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90508474576 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.56307096286 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66008620233 2.78398813304 96% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 204.123752495 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447457627119 0.468620217663 95% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 705.55239521 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.70958083832 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 19.7664670659 46% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.8473053892 140% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.6584249077 57.8364921388 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.777777778 119.503703932 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.7777777778 23.324526521 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.70786347227 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.67664670659 43% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.478148975624 0.218282227539 219% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.27462267031 0.0743258471296 369% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14251201733 0.0701772020484 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.368304593766 0.128457276422 287% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811686771341 0.0628817314937 129% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 14.3799401198 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 48.3550499002 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.197005988 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 12.5979740519 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.32208582834 97% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 98.500998004 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.1389221557 133% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.9071856287 126% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.