Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.
The above argument states that the woven baskets were a characteristic of the Palean villages since it was only found in that particular geographic location. The discovery of these baskets in the neighboring village of lithos however, castes a doubt on the uniqueness of the Palean baskets. Before jumping on to any conclusion it is only fair that we have look at all the evidence available for such a claim.
Firstly, it is important to know about the people of Lithos. Whether they were capable of building boats and travelling away from their local villages. It might be possible that these people travelled to the Palean villages and learned the peculiar weaving techniques and successfully emulated it in their villages.
Secondly, in the prehistoric period people used leaves, animal skins, flowers and other naturally occurring substances to decorate their art. Due to the absence of modern technological tools the Arcadian human only used normal human labor to carry out weaving operations. Along with it if the two villages had similar weather it is likely that they have developed similar flora and fauna in these locations. This might have unknowingly resulted in similar craftwork given the fact that modern developed technology was absent during that times.
Lastly, humans learned to make patterns by observing the nature around him. The two villages were separated from the Brim river. The ecological system around one common river might have led to the development of similar pattern in the handiwork. Hence, it becomes vital to learn more about the cultural and natural diversity of the two villages.
Furthermore, it can be said that more information is needed to either support or weaken the claims made in the above argument. The presence of these information can lead us to different findings thus opening a new bunch conclusions. The mere presence of these baskets in another village and the geographically difficult accessibility are weak claims to make any credible comments on the uniqueness of the Palean baskets.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
argument 1 -- OK
argument 2 -- out of topic
argument 3 -- not exactly
----------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 330 350
No. of Characters: 1681 1500
No. of Different Words: 184 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.262 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.094 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.691 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 128 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 95 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 66 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 40 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.412 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.314 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.529 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.299 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.299 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.088 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es. Secondly, in the prehistoric period people used leaves, animal skins, flower...
^^
Line 4, column 54, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding nature'?
Suggestion: the surrounding nature
...s learned to make patterns by observing the nature around him. The two villages were separated from t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
... in the above argument. The presence of these information can lead us to different findings thus ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, lastly, look, second, secondly, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.6327345309 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 28.8173652695 108% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 55.5748502994 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1716.0 2260.96107784 76% => OK
No of words: 330.0 441.139720559 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2 5.12650576532 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75708287303 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 204.123752495 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563636363636 0.468620217663 120% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 705.55239521 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9103647075 57.8364921388 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.941176471 119.503703932 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4117647059 23.324526521 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.70786347227 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.25449101796 57% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.88822355289 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.67664670659 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19704648367 0.218282227539 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0570808178341 0.0743258471296 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569864230056 0.0701772020484 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103455198616 0.128457276422 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0812913682138 0.0628817314937 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.3799401198 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.3550499002 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.5979740519 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.32208582834 110% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 98.500998004 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.