Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.
The author of the argument want to say that the woven basket which is found in palea is has unique pattern so that basket is uniquely palean basket, but a basket is also found in opposite site of the river there is another village Lithos, so now author claims that the palean woven basket pattern is not unique pattern because it is also found in lithos. At first look it might be like to bolster the authors argument but if we do detailed study of this we find some loopholes.
The author argued that recently archaeologists discover Palen basket in lithos , & between both the villages there is a Brim River which is very deep & broad but it is now very deep & broad so we can’t say that at ancient time it is also deep it may be shallow & narrow that people go across the river. By seasons variations it also said that the river will dried in summer so that people can go from palean to lithos.
Secondly, author told that there is no palean boats found at river side but from this we can’t say that lithos have no boats. It may be possible that Lithos people travel by boat & buy this palean baskets. Some other merchants who came from other villages, also have their boasts & they sold these baskets to lithos. It is also possible that palean people do migration due to some reason or palean people married with lithos & made these uniquely palean basket in lithos. There are many certain possibilities.
Last but not least, author said that recently archaeologists discovered such “a Palean" basket in Lithos that means they found one palean basket in lithos from this we can’t say that there are many palean baskets. For one basket there are many possibilities. For example a palean basket is woven so it can flow from river flow to lithos village so we can say that it was an accident. The argument might be stronger if authors suggest that there are many woven baskets found in lithos.
Ultimately, the argument might be strong if it provides more information about villages & river’s characteristic.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 402, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...st look it might be like to bolster the authors argument but if we do detailed study of...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 479, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d study of this we find some loopholes. The author argued that recently archaeol...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ologists discover Palen basket in lithos , & between both the villages there is a ...
^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'dry'
Suggestion: dry
...ations it also said that the river will dried in summer so that people can go from pa...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 120, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...villages & river's characteristic.
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'for example']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.226600985222 0.25644967241 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.179802955665 0.15541462614 116% => OK
Adjectives: 0.100985221675 0.0836205057962 121% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0418719211823 0.0520304965353 80% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0492610837438 0.0272364105082 181% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.130541871921 0.125424944231 104% => OK
Participles: 0.0197044334975 0.0416121511921 47% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.47060975691 2.79052419416 89% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0147783251232 0.026700313972 55% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.001811407834 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.076354679803 0.113004496875 68% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0295566502463 0.0255425247493 116% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00985221674877 0.0127820249294 77% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2060.0 2731.13054187 75% => OK
No of words: 364.0 446.07635468 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65934065934 6.12365571057 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.57801047555 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.326923076923 0.378187486979 86% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.184065934066 0.287650121315 64% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.107142857143 0.208842608468 51% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0549450549451 0.135150697306 41% => More words length more than 8 chars wanted.
Word Length SD: 2.47060975691 2.79052419416 89% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 207.018472906 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.403846153846 0.469332199767 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 41.2323548257 52.1807786196 79% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.039408867 70% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.2022227129 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 88.1218138807 57.7814097925 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.142857143 141.986410481 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 23.2022227129 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.714285714286 0.724660767414 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.58251231527 140% => OK
Readability: 44.4065934066 51.9672348444 85% => OK
Elegance: 1.39090909091 1.8405768891 76% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201405298843 0.441005458295 46% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.143313218271 0.135418324435 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0747439407809 0.0829849096947 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.591240764242 0.58762219726 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.23309445818 0.147661913831 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848795406821 0.193483328276 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550708459635 0.0970749176394 57% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.356186491276 0.42659136922 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.144808048096 0.0774707102158 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128678233328 0.312017818177 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557548780142 0.0698173142475 80% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.33743842365 36% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 6.87684729064 58% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.82512315271 145% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 6.46551724138 31% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.82389162562 212% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 14.657635468 75% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.