Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.
Based on the authors opinion, they came to the conclusion that woven basket with a particular distinctive pattern that were only found in the village of palea were made by the Palean people. The author uses the examples of specifying the difficulty the Brim river, a neighboring waterway, presented in crossing it and the lack of Palean boats for their people to travel to Lithos as evidence for reaching their conclusion. The Palean people could have migrated via land routes to Lithos. Another posibility is that the people from Lithos traveled to Palea and shared resources and knowledge with the Palean people. In presenting these 2 posibilities, it permits the likelyhood the author's argument is incorrect.
Traveling via boat is not the only way of reaching Lithos. The Palean people could have traveled via land trading routes to Lithos to trade goods and knowledge on how to create baskets. While boats are a faster means of arriving from one destination to another, they are not the only means. The author makes the assumption that access to Lithos via boats is the only means of acquiring and transferring knowledge on how to make these baskets.
Futhermore, who is not to say that the people from Lithos did not seek out Palean people to trade with. Historically, people have already adventured across the horizon in search for mystery will the possibity of trading goods with others. The people from Lithos very well could have taken this adventure and traveled to Palea in search of tradeable good or learn how to craft the unique baskets.
However, if we were to assume the accuracy of the authors assumption, a stronger case of support could be made if the author were to also include reviews of demographic trading paterns during that time. As mentioned before, people from all over the globe at one time or another have taken expeditions whether across land or water that required them to be away from home for many months and sometimes even years just to have access to rare items or resources. Who is to say that was not the same case for the Palean or Lithos people. If the author researched the traveling habits of the palean people or reviewed if it was the people from Lithos who travelled to Palea, stronger support could be made for their agrument. There was no mention made that any Lithonian boats were discovered and they could very well have been the seamen.
In conclusion, based on the authors assumption to reach a conlusion that distinctive woven pattern of basked were produced only by the Palean people based on the fact that they were not able to discover any boats makes for weak support. The author deserves to give the matter more research time and consider other posiblities before reaching such a conclusion. While some facts the author presents do deserve strong merit of consideration, the authos fails to deliver enough evidence to support their claim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
Based on the authors opinion, they came to the conclusion th...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 392, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r people to travel to Lithos as evidence for reaching their conclusion. The Palea...
^^
Line 1, column 683, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...bilities, it permits the likelyhood the authors argument is incorrect. Traveling via...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 51, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...f we were to assume the accuracy of the authors assumption, a stronger case of support ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 29, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... seamen. In conclusion, based on the authors assumption to reach a conlusion that di...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'well', 'while', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.261859582543 0.25644967241 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.184060721063 0.15541462614 118% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0531309297913 0.0836205057962 64% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0398481973435 0.0520304965353 77% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0246679316888 0.0272364105082 91% => OK
Prepositions: 0.132827324478 0.125424944231 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0569259962049 0.0416121511921 137% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.50214302746 2.79052419416 90% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0512333965844 0.026700313972 192% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00189753320683 0.001811407834 105% => OK
Determiners: 0.117647058824 0.113004496875 104% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0132827324478 0.0255425247493 52% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0189753320683 0.0127820249294 148% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2907.0 2731.13054187 106% => OK
No of words: 494.0 446.07635468 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88461538462 6.12365571057 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.57801047555 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.356275303644 0.378187486979 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.228744939271 0.287650121315 80% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.15991902834 0.208842608468 77% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0971659919028 0.135150697306 72% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50214302746 2.79052419416 90% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 207.018472906 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.439271255061 0.469332199767 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 49.8028512993 52.1807786196 95% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.039408867 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.7 23.2022227129 106% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.92548614 57.7814097925 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.35 141.986410481 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7 23.2022227129 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.35 0.724660767414 48% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 3.58251231527 140% => OK
Readability: 47.5744939271 51.9672348444 92% => OK
Elegance: 1.81679389313 1.8405768891 99% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.482144536451 0.441005458295 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.133427936461 0.135418324435 99% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0680522197547 0.0829849096947 82% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.609819260844 0.58762219726 104% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.10848301171 0.147661913831 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.213968056029 0.193483328276 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0809986418677 0.0970749176394 83% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.491818382531 0.42659136922 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.035671315972 0.0774707102158 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.343760356908 0.312017818177 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063153234452 0.0698173142475 90% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.33743842365 120% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.87684729064 44% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.82512315271 145% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 6.46551724138 139% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.82389162562 177% => OK
Total topic words: 17.0 14.657635468 116% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.