It is debatable which is the main factor to define a great leader. In this regard, I disagree with the statement that in any field those in power should be required to step down after five years. This is because continuous leadership provides advantages depending on fields.
Admittedly, stepping down after five years, society can preclude leaders' malfeasance in some fields. It is undeniable that leaders can abuse their power when they have the power persistently. Many democratic systems show that power should be monitored by society. Otherwise, the dogmatic leader may be denigrated during history as a whole. For instance, in South Korea, Park Jung-hee is a famous dictatorial leader in the 1960s to 70s. With the restrained presidential power by democratic institutions, he changed the law and infringed into the presidential election to win the election. As he was keeping his power for more than five years, citizens struggled from his authoritarian leadership. In this case, it seems convincing that leaders should step down their power after five years.
However, it is not always true that leaders should delegate their power to others in all fields. By stepping down the power after five years, there might yield negative side effects to some extent. In the field of business, a consistent company's vision and belief are more advantageous and profitable by one leader. Steve Jobs, a former CEO of Apple, is a good example to demonstrate the idea. Apple is well known as one of the innovative American brands. Before Jobs dead, Apple had been developed with one belief of Jobs. However, when another person has been a leader and changed the vision of Apple somewhat differently, the reputation and popularity of Apple are getting declined. In the field of business, stepping down a leader's power is not always reasonable.
Moreover, keeping power by one person would provide more benefits in some fields. Through continuous leadership, society can overcome the crisis and embarrassing situations. In the field of politics, although dictators are harmful to society as a whole, legitimate persistent leadership is useful in a special period. For example, Franklin D. Roosevelt, a former President in the United States, won President elections two times so that he can stay in the power for more than five years. Since he was in the presidency for such a long time, the States can overcome the Great Depression by his consistent plan, called by the New Deal plan. Because he can maintain its power for more than five years, the plan successfully was implemented in the States. Therefore, a leader's power can be projected more than five years and the phenomenon is required in some fields.
To sum up, although leadership might be impaired without any limitation, there are many drawbacks to applying the belief to all fields. It can be beneficial for society to make leaders continue to have their power for more than five years in some fields.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is debatable which is the main factor...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rovides advantages depending fields. Admittedly, stepping down after five yea...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[2]
Message: You should probably use 'show'.
Suggestion: show
...r persistently. Many democratic systems shows that power should be monitored by socie...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 796, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d step down his power after five years. However, it is not always true that...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 763, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...leaders power is not always reasonable. Moreover, keeping power by one pers...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 859, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... phenomenon is required in some fields. To sum up, although leadership migh...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, in fact, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2454.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 480.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1125 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68069463864 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7420307509 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.475 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 766.8 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3868122901 60.3974514979 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.6206896552 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5517241379 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75862068966 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228889509052 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720757367545 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797557697748 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153038927347 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561437992637 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.