1. Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The author claims that the best indicator of a society identity is the hero or heroine of that society. He also supports his claim with the reason that heroes are idealistic of each society. I fundamentally disagree with this proposition. In what follows, I will list the most effective reasons which cast doubt on the accuracy of this claim and its reason.
The first reason which makes the claim skeptic is the paling of terms such as the hero or heroine at the modern life, which occurs for the sake of modernization and technological development. Indeed, nowadays according to the complexity of each task, there is a requirement of experts or proficient on that specific task, until the presented task stands at its head level. Consequently, the terms of hero and heroine coverts to the more specialist terms such as an expert which solves the problems with his or her intelligence or brilliance. However, these experts are not as well-known as the champions by the public; they are popular with a group of people who deal with the same task. Besides, since there are various fields of expertise, there are hundreds of experts in each society. In this scenario, searching an idealistic person for each society is not a connivant way.
The second reason is the general and holistic definition of the heroes which is identical in all regions. In another word, if the heroes or heroines are considered by their traditional definition, are individuals with supernatural abilities who fight against poverty, misfortune, and injustice. According to this definition, there is no difference between the western and eastern heroes and no one could understand the specific feature of a society by the consideration of warriors' feature. For instance, the western version of the warrior is Robin Hood, who stands against the injustice to help the poor people. On the other hand, Rostam is the eastern version of the Robin Hood who did the same tasks. According to this claim, the western and eastern people should have the same character. However, the extroverted behavior of western people is totally opposite the introverted feature of eastern people.
Finally, the author uses the reason that a champion’s manners at the specific society are the highest idealistic of that society. First of all, the term of the personality of society should be clarified until we could understand the failure of this reason. From my perspective, the character of a society is the set of norms, beliefs, and behaviors which accepted and presented by the majority of people at that society. This definition has the contradiction with the generality of hero and heroine in which society. In the statistical perspective, if the feature of a set or group is considered for the valuation, the main of all members are considered for evaluation rather than the maximum or minimum ones. At this reason, the writer considered as the victor’s features which rarely covers the one-hundredth of society as the indicator of whole society’s feature.
To wrap it all, all discussed reasons, the meaning lost of hero in the modernized society, identically of hero’s feature, and wrong case selection for the evaluation of all society cast doubt on the validity of this claim and its reason.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 880, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or each society is not a connivant way. The second reason is the general and hol...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...introverted feature of eastern people. Finally, the author uses the reason that...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, finally, first, however, if, second, so, well, for instance, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2746.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 539.0 442.535393258 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09461966605 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81833721656 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91013432123 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.43599257885 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 864.0 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3447040904 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.416666667 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4583333333 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222637876456 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684434010889 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616389330756 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145914406751 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503707052092 0.0667264976115 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.