3 Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could

Essay topics:

3.Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.

Scandals, although seem eye-catching and have nothing to do with the progress of society, they are useful because they focus on problems in ways that no speaker and reformer ever could.

To begin, political scandals can help the government to correct their unethical behaviors. Scandals like PRISM scandal and the Cambridge Analytica scandal are related to government surveillance and the intrude of individual’s privacy. Government tried hard to mask these kinds of unethical behaviors in order to control its citizens. But after scandals pop up, the government has to correct its misbehavior, reluctantly at most times, to resolve the anger of the people. Take the CCP (the China’s Communist Party) as an example. When the coronavirus first broke out in Wuhan, two important meeting of the CCP was going, and in order to make the two meeting go well, the government of Wuhan concealed the coronavirus outbreak and admonished several doctors who had warned the public about the severity of the virus. But one month later, the Wuhan government’s misbehavior was revealed in the internet, arousing people’s anger towards the Wuhan government. Accordingly, to ease the anger of people, more than ten officials of Wuhan were dismissed.

In addition, some scandals can make people reflect about the essence of human-beings and thus make a better world. Many scandals are not only related to controversial issues that are debated a lot in the society, but also give us an opportunity to rethink about the essence behind the specific issue. In 2017, He Jiankui, a Chinese scientist working in Southern University of Science and Technology, claimed that he successfully produced genetically altered babies in Shenzhen. This claimant shocked both the public and the academia, and immediately became a scandal. Retrospecting to the last century, when the first clone sheep was produced, people began to doubt that is we are we living in the science fiction movie and the world in which full of Frankenstein is not far from us. Back to the CRISPR-baby scandal, people tend to rethink about human decency, about the dignity of human: Are human the experimental mice or something integral that should not be impaired by others’ will? Alienation, objectification are all in confrontation with our human nature, and that is what the public can learn from the seemingly meaningless scandal.

However, I have to admit that many scandals are nothing but eye-catching sexual affairs. Scandals are often be revealed by the media, which are operated either by the government or big corporations. For the former, media are more like the government’s propaganda machine and the mouthpiece of the party in power, thus they wish for more people have the motive to read through the content. For the latter, media have to publish something that are original and provocative which can increase the amount of reading and thus can earn more advertisement income. Media, thus, either are owned by the government or by giant companies, are willing to report a lot of sexual affairs of celebrities that are meaningless for the society. Take the Clinton sexual affair as an example. When that affair was exposed, the first thought of the public was not to think about the attacking between the Republican party and the Democratic party, as well as the polarization of American society, but to search the pictures of Lewinsky. And although Clinton himself is an ambitious politician who contributed a lot to the economic boom of the U.S., he lost the respect from the people and failed the election of the president.

In a nutshell, although many scandals are meaningless to the society, they have the significance of correcting misbehavior and reflect about the human nature.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 199, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... related to government surveillance and the intrude of individual’s privacy. Government tri...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, however, if, so, thus, well, as to, in addition, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 89.0 58.6224719101 152% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3157.0 2235.4752809 141% => OK
No of words: 610.0 442.535393258 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17540983607 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.96972615649 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89545000724 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 300.0 215.323595506 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491803278689 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 983.7 704.065955056 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0448805766 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.28 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 17.0 5.13820224719 331% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16318842476 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430508422268 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953332368331 0.0758088955206 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140082066049 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.174587788899 0.0667264976115 262% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 156.0 100.480337079 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.