The author claims that the effective leadership of a country can be commensurated by studying the well being of the citizens of the country. As far as I am considered, I mostly agree with the statement though it cannot be deemed to be true in all the cases. Also the author fails to provide convincing examples to justify the stand,
Coming to the point of leadership's effectiveness, it has significant importance with the well being of the citizens. For example, let us take an example of a developed nation, like USA where the standard of living and per capita income are relatively high when compared to the third worldly nations. This can be taken as a measure of the effectiveness of living standards amongst the citizens of the country. And so, USA has demonstrated significant domination over the other countries for quite a long time with its political members, innovators from the country taking part in active politics and helped the country in obtaining a supremo status.
Although some people argue that there have been a few instances observed across the world, where leaders have grown from puny states of an under-developed nation, yet proved to be the fiercest and strongest leaders among the world. For example, the president of the country, Cuba namely Che Guevara came from a middle class family. Though the country was on the verge of a collapse with two wordly super powers trying to gain control over the region. He raised above the ranks, unified the nation against external interventions and brought stability, prosperity to the nation.
In addition to the above points discussed, we can undoubtedly agree that if the citizens of a nation are disciplined and responsible towards their actions which will help in their all around development, the country will see a tremendous growth in every sector. This would catalyse country's growth and so the leaders can shift their focus on sectors like, research,military to lay a solid foundation and in the expansion of its roots across.
Hence I would like to conclude by saying that the hypothesis laid by the author didnot have concrete examples to support. While I support the statement, it could have been bolstered with relevant statements to add clarity to it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 259, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... be deemed to be true in all the cases. Also the author fails to provide convincing ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...uevara came from a middle class family. Though the country was on the verge of a colla...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 364, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , military
...ft their focus on sectors like, research,military to lay a solid foundation and in the ex...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... in the expansion of its roots across. Hence I would like to conclude by saying that...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, so, third, well, while, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 374.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98930481283 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3976220399 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82250123072 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580213903743 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1179377058 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.285714286 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.64285714286 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204504217509 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065663246466 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475765538075 0.0758088955206 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103997850801 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427245050133 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.