All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
A company's efficiency is determined by the productivity and ingenuity of its employees. A company with agile and determined employees can provide better services in efficient time and since, a company's development will also help their personal development, they tend to strive for the growth of their companies. So, it will be beneficial for an organization to take insights from thier own employees rather than relying on some third party consultants.
The employees working in an organization, understand the internal workings of the organization and will be well aware about the problems they face regularly. An individual handling a project, can give us a better insight about the issues and hindrances he or she faces while working on it, this information cannot be obtained from an outside source as the resources vary from one organization to another, only an indiviual who has a good acquaintance with the organization's work environment can give a pertinent and deeper insight about the optimization and developemnt of projects. This implies that, for any organization, a feedback from their own employees can be really helpful in its development.
This reliance on their own team will also be economical as they do not have to hire any consultants. Also, by listening to their own employees increases the morale among the employees and in turn the efficiency of these employees will also increase, there by generating more revenue. So, listening to their own employees is not only an efficacious practice but also a prudent one.
There have been many instances of industrial espionage in the past. With the increasing competition, some organizations resort to such malicious practices in order to gain dominance in their respective industries. By inviting third party consultants, organizations allow the risk for such malpractices to increase. If the validity of a consultant is not checked thoroughly, then there is a likelihood for these third party employees to leak classified information and eventually, can place the organization in jeopardy. Such practices can be thwarted if the organizations just rely on their own employees.
There are some employees in every organization who misuse such feedback programs for their own benefit. They might suggest some changes that may not directly benefit the organization but can help the employee heavily. Employees should understand that feedbacks are used for solving the employee issues and thereby increasing the efficiency inside the organization and not as an opportunity for an individual to suggest changes for his or her own personal benefit.
Hence, organizations should devote more time in listening to their own employees, while educating them about the importance of such practices and avoid the interference of outside consultants.
- Torreya Taxifolia tree decline and migration 73
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying 66
- Claim Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive Reason It is primarily in cities that a nation s cultural traditions are preserved and generated Write a response in which you discuss the ext 50
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal rec 54
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled foo 49
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, really, so, then, third, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2370.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 439.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3986332574 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16982644146 2.79657885939 113% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473804100228 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 748.8 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.5107737073 60.3974514979 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.666666667 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3888888889 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.21951772744 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267486282082 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972574764585 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562016818599 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153577388522 0.150359130593 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557607461993 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.