All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position
The corporate world is a well oiled machine with each employee acting as a cog, small or large in aiding its operations. Like any other machine, the corporate world always seeks to increase efficiency with which it achieves its goals. But often things don't go as planned and certain actions plod the company or organization from reaching peak efficacy. Consultants are brought in to intervene and find out the cause of this slow down and they often act like a media to bring out the problems or dissent existing within the company. I feel a little introspection on the company's part; paying heed to its own employees suggesiton and concerns will do just as good a job as a consultant would .That is why, I agree with a prompt and believe that if any organization listens to its employees more often, they will themselves discover ways to increase efficiency and there won't be a need to hire conseultants. The heart of a company is its employees. The company's success lies largely on the shoulders of its staff. However, an unhappy employee will be less likely to give his/her best for the company and thus reduce its efficiency. Consultancy firms often take employee interviews and try to make the employees of the companies point out ways which might be reducing the efficiency of the company. More often than not these problems can be as simple as lack of transperancy in the inner workings of the firm and pay disparities among others that often dissuade an employee from striving to work better. If the company has a thorough feedback mechanism where problems of the employee are regularly taken into account, they are not only cutting the middle man (in this case the consultancy firm) out and receiving first hand information regarding problems in their company but also in a way being financially efficient by saving money that they would otherwise spend hiring a consultant to do the same. It is a win-win situation. By doing this, the employee has ample opportunities to bring problems to the companies notice and the company get ways to be more efficient. Corporate heirarchy can often cause a drift between employer and employee. The mere thought of somebody being at a higher post is enough for people to be jealous. There are a lot of instances where corporate heirarchy causes dissent amongst its people. Employees are upset because they're being pushed too hard by their boss and they have no respite. A simple solution to this would be if the boss could know the employees problems and the fact that they are exhausted. An open door policy, where in employees are free to visit their superiors' or seniors' office without any prior notice really helps to ease this feeling of having no respite. Approachable bosses are sure to make employees happy and can ease the daunting seniority that often irks people. We see a large number of companies that have open door policies and employees have reported to be better at their work because of habig more affable bosses. This policy facilitates an open mode of communication in both directions; top down and bottom up. Now, there are some things that a consultancy firm can do for you that simple conversation between employers and employees cannot do. These may include development strategies and other technical strategies that cannot be figured out by mere open dialogue. The companies are welcome to hire consultants for the same. However, I feel that a company listening to its employees is sure to figure out ninety percent of its problems and move towards being a more efficient workspace. Humans are communicative creatures and therefore, communication is paramount to our survival and prosperity in all aspects of life. Introspection is the most powerful teacher.
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaints re 49
- Everyone must study the same national curriculum till high school 66
- All too often companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees such consultants would be unnecessary Write a response in which you discuss 58
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 50
- The most effective way to understand contemporary culture is to analyse the trends of its youth 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...it achieves its goals. But often things dont go as planned and certain actions plod ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 459, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a medium' or simply 'media'?
Suggestion: a medium; media
... this slow down and they often act like a media to bring out the problems or dissent ex...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 690, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...just as good a job as a consultant would .That is why, I agree with a prompt and b...
^^
Line 1, column 692, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: That
...st as good a job as a consultant would .That is why, I agree with a prompt and belie...
^^^^
Line 1, column 2346, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: they're
...its people. Employees are upset because theyre being pushed too hard by their boss and...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 2827, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...eniority that often irks people. We see a large number of companies that have open door policies ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, really, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, i feel
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3097.0 2235.4752809 139% => OK
No of words: 631.0 442.535393258 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90808240887 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.01195704033 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73170873529 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 307.0 215.323595506 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486529318542 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 972.0 704.065955056 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.7761379297 60.3974514979 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.607142857 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5357142857 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.14285714286 5.21951772744 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.97078651685 20% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367032550963 0.243740707755 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984684608778 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888919945512 0.0758088955206 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.367032550963 0.150359130593 244% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.