All too often, companies hire outside consultants
to suggest ways for the company to operate more
efficiently. If companies were to spend more time
listening to their own employees, such consultants
would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to
which you agree or disagree with these statements
and explain your reasoning for the position you take.
In developing and supporting your position, you
should consider ways in which the statements might
or might not hold true and explain how these
considerations shape your position.
For any organization to work efficiently, it is very crucial to have a sense of cooperation among its members. From the ceo of the company to a lower-level employee, everyone should be comfortable in listening to the opinions of others. Because when an idea is discussed with another person it becomes more clear and robust. Hence, having a healthy discussion with the employees can help in achieving higher levels of success. Some companies do hire different consultants from outside for suggestions to make the company operate more efficiently. However, I completely agree with the statement that a company's efficiency would increase to a huge extent if it allocates more time listening to its own employees rather than hiring outside consultants.
For example, Lenskart company in india has seen tremendous success in the past few years and the net worth of the company has increased many folds. it was only possible due to the cooperation between the members of the company and the valuable conversations of the higher authorities with the employees. The ceo of the company in his various interviews has given credit to its employees for their million dollar suggestions.
According to a research study done in india in 2020, it was found that the companies which have a nice relationship with the employees and have seen significant growth in their buisness.
Finally, for a company to increase its working efficiency, it is of paramount importance to spend more time listening to their own employees, which turns out to be benificial.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 148, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...f the company has increased many folds. it was only possible due to the cooperatio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, hence, however, if, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 14.8657303371 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1292.0 2235.4752809 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 252.0 442.535393258 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12698412698 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.55969084622 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97297180452 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56746031746 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 704.065955056 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3420125522 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.454545455 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9090909091 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41453810927 0.243740707755 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152312475498 0.0831039109588 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111035317163 0.0758088955206 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237358285484 0.150359130593 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955484144374 0.0667264976115 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 100.480337079 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.