All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Though employees deem that they know what is best for the company, companies should hire outside consultants to help the company operate more effectively, as the consultants are unbiased, trained, and will be able to keep peace within the office.
Firstly, consultants are come into the office as a neutral party. Many times, employees have biased opinions on how they think the company should operate. However, the employees only look at the company from one perspective. The outside consultants do not have any preconceived notions of the company, and are therefore, able to give a clear headed third party perspective on the company’s most efficient way to operate. They do not favor one person over another, but people within the office do. Thus, if the company were to listen to their employees on how to run, the company would not benefit.
Secondly, the consultants are trained in how to help companies operate most efficiently. This is their living, as opposed to the company’s employees who do not have this background. The company’s employees should focus on their own job and try to make their job run as smoothly as possible, as opposed to trying to calculate someone else’s job. For instance, if one person is an artist, then they are not necessarily an art store owner, who knows how to run a proper business; therefore, if the artist would want to open a store, he/she would either hire someone or take some time off from painting and learn how to manage a store. Nonetheless, this would mean that the artist would not be focused on his/her painting. Similarly, if the employee is worrying about how to operate their company most efficiently, then he/she is not completely focused on their job. A company should not give its employees an option to try to act as consultants, and should bring in outside consultants who are trained in this field.
Lastly, outside consultants would help keep harmony within the company. Differing opinions on how the company should operate can drift employees apart, forcing the company to fall apart. However, with outside consultants, the employees’ opinions will be dismissed, which will mitigate arguments amongst the employees. The outside consultants will only keep the peace in the office, while imparting their wisdom and benefiting the company.
Despite the fact that consultants are neutral and trained, they might not understand the intricacies of the specific companies that hire them. In many companies, politics and hierarchies are key to the foundation of the company. The outside consultants may be unaware of these, and may try to change or eradicate them, which are the key foundations of the company. Because of the extensive history of the company, outside consultants may not be beneficial to the company in these circumstances.
Companies may wish to listen to their employees about how to operate, but outside consultants would be beneficial for the company since outside consultants offer unbiased opinions, are trained in this field, and can keep peace within the office. Companies can act as a role model for other and take the appropriate measures to ensure efficient operations and happy employees.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, look, may, nonetheless, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, therefore, third, thus, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 12.4196629213 201% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2695.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 521.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17274472169 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77759609229 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85917882795 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.418426103647 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 839.7 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 3.10617977528 322% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 7.0 1.77640449438 394% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6756030126 60.3974514979 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.291666667 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7083333333 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383557030224 0.243740707755 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125809194464 0.0831039109588 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782378948589 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237016060668 0.150359130593 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450636923278 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.