Technology can play a vital role in advancing the education process, it aids schools with improved methods for instructing students. While many people argue that these technologies all too often distract students from real learning, I believe technologies, such as; video, computers, and the Internet, have many positive effects on the education progress if we use them correctly.
Technology provides teachers with a plethora of teaching tools, which entices the students' tendency to learn, enrich their knowledge, and thrive their learning experiences. In contrast, traditional teaching methods humper their curiosity to learn, since teachers are restrained with the restricted resources of teaching. For instance, Astronomy teacher in the past might use pictures from the books or graphics to demonstrate students understanding of the space. Nowadays, students can view live videos from the space, explore NASA website, and review different resources about the space online, which help them sustain a comprehensive understanding of the subject.
Moreover, using technologies in education keeps teachers on track with new teaching methodologies, and deter the students dependancy on the teacher. Which gives teachers the opportunity to elevate their teaching skills, also, it promotes interactive education. Students in interactive education can play a vital role; they can develop their own hypothesis and search for answers to prove it, or they can create their own projects using computers and the internet. As a result, technology escalates student's creativity and improve his learning progress.
On the other hand, students' fascination about the technology may impede their learning progress. For example, many parents think that using electronics by their children may distract them and deter their concentration on learning. It might be true with the excisive use, but this issue can be solved with the controlled and supervised use of technology. Using technology in education process should not underestimate the role of teacher, teachers should use technologies in parallel with other teachings methods to enrich students learning experience.
In conclusion, technology in education has two faces; while it can broaden students' horizon and enrich their learning experience, it can have deteriorating effects on their education.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ra of teaching tools, which entices the students tendency to learn, enrich their knowled...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...w teaching methodologies, and deter the students dependancy on the teacher. Which gives ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 541, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to experience'
Suggestion: to experience
...ngs methods to enrich students learning experience. In conclusion, technology in educat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 19.5258426966 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2012.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 346.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.81502890173 5.05705443957 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99065223687 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540462427746 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2318812401 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.133333333 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0666666667 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.21951772744 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153226288993 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615072509447 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0604841380784 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105626096758 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100816008295 0.0667264976115 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.1639044944 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.