Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Technology is permeating into every part of our lives at an unprecedent rate. In the present time of a pandemic when the mobility of the people is hindered, technology has become even more important to get work done right from where ever we are stranded. Consequently, the usage of video, computers and th Internet has shot up even in the field of education. The prompt suggests that these technologies are not as much boon as bane as they cause distraction. I disagree with the prompt for the following reasons.
Firstly, technologies like video, computers, and the Internet have radically changed the way we deliver in the class. Since the inception of human beings, teaching was primarily done by writing and drawing on a surface and explaining about it.And not everything can be clearly expressed with the help of a black board due to the inherent physical limitations of such medium. The depth of understanding that one gets throught such a system of education is limited by the imigination of the students which inturn is hindered by their experiences. One is implicitly told to imagine what ever you could and understand what ever you can. Thus, we can see that an edification that lack the usage of technology can greatly impede the learning. With the help of technologies, we can deliver lectures in a that was not imagined even in the wildest dreams by our anscetors. With computer graphics, we can put forward the convoluted phenomena in such a way that even the poorest student can grasp the concepts. Therefore, technology plays a pivotal role in enhancing the learning.
Secondly, the educatios systems all around the world are embracing these technologies as they make students to engage actively in the classrooms. What looked like an insipid and static images a few years ago have been turned into interesting dynamic visuals that attract the attention of the minds of the students which otherwise loiter in their own world of fanciful imagination. Thus, these technologies help to attract the attention as well as improve the attention span in the students.
However, in the realms of our discussion, we cannot ignore a few exceptions. Usage of these technologies without proper restriction can significantly cause distration. The problem majorly occurs when the students are not being monitored either in school or at home. Therefore, is advisable to keep a close watch on the students when they are using these technologies.
To recapitulate, technology has revolutioned the way we teach in the class as they provide means to present even the most intricate information as lucidly as possible as well as they make learning content more interesting. However, they are also likely to cause distration when the students use these technologies without restrictions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 244, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: And
...ng on a surface and explaining about it.And not everything can be clearly expressed...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2337.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 457.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11378555799 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94707662657 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520787746171 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 739.8 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3744762105 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.227272727 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7727272727 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184842301096 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0518539128064 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0269782716551 0.0758088955206 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0961271531464 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0194234205131 0.0667264976115 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.