Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Leadership is probably the most important skill to possess in the contemporary world. However, to become a good leader, the approach to leadership is more critical than just possessing the ability to lead. The prompt recommends that leaders should adopt practices that allow leaders to maintain the respect of their peers and not worry all that much about making a sound moral judgment. In my opinion, I strongly agree with the prompt for the following two reasons.
To begin with, a leader is only as good as the people around him. In other words, the effectiveness of a leader is highly influenced by the advice given by his/her contemporaries, which further depends on the degree of reverence the leader's peers have for him/her. For instance, the Indian Prime Minister, Narendra Singh Modi, a member of the BJP political party, his highly revered by the members of the parliament. While there are thousands of people in the country who call him a fascist, the member of his cabinet still respect him and believe in him. This respect and trust in him, allowed Modi to come up with effective strategies to combat the spread of the deadly Corona virus (COVID-19). These strategies, however, were not the work of the prime minister alone, but the combined effort of the cabinet of ministers who readily advised the prime minister. The ministers helped the prime minister so readily due to their reverence of the prime minister. The above example illustrates that for a leader to be effective in crunch situations, he/she needs to be respected by his/her peers in order to make the right decision.
Further, if a leader his not respected by his/her peers, why will anyone else pay heed to what the leader says. For example, say a leader is not well respected by his/her peers. The common man outside the leadership framework interprets this lack of respect as a lack of trust. Now the common man starts to question why he/she should listen to a leader, to whom even his/her peers don't trust and believe in. In such a scenario, any policy enforced by the leader, even if it is beneficial to the people, will be looked askance by the people the leader rules over. This example clearly shows how a leader who is not respected by his/her peers will be highly ineffective when comes to implementing policies.
Of course, a few people argue that making sound moral judgments is paramount to implement effective policies. However, isn't this precisely why leaders should worry more about the respect they get from their peers? A leader who is respected by his/her peers will have a strong advisory network, which further becomes a strong base from which he/she can implement very "effective policies". In conclusion, a leader who garners the respect of his contemporaries will be able to make better decisions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 44, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding people'?
Suggestion: the surrounding people
...begin with, a leader is only as good as the people around him. In other words, the effectiveness of a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...to a leader, to whom even his/her peers dont trust and believe in. In such a scenari...
^^^^
Line 7, column 120, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... implement effective policies. However, isnt this precisely why leaders should worry...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, of course, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2342.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 476.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92016806723 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66976059543 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487394957983 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 720.9 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6258219756 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.454545455 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.59090909091 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291395450686 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917329803881 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647745826005 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1927028793 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0316892118964 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.