Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers

Essay topics:

Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.

No matter how morally sound my father is when he sacrifices time spent with family at work, he loses our respect and when was the last time you listened to someone you did not respect?

A leader, by definition, is someone who can take responsibility for his peers and guide them forward, while moral judgment plays an important role in making the right decisions, the moral choice may not be the best choice for the good of the group, perhaps the village leader needs to steal from the nearby village to feed his people, an act that will no doubt make the villagers respect him.
An interesting example is throughout history, the most effective leaders have undoubtedly been those with questionable moral judgment, charismatic men like Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussolini have often led their people with such fervor and passion, that they effectively brainwashed the population, and earned so much respect from their peers, that they became the de facto leaders, and no doubt the most effective leaders we have ever seen.

When I tell you someone is an effective leader, it means his peers execute his wishes without any questions, if the prime minister's peers had no respect for him they would not remain loyal to him. Another perspective is that between parent and child, a child that does not respect his/her parents will go out of their way to make life difficult for their parents, for deep inside his subconscious mind he wishes to rebel and act in spite against his parents' wishes, which means the parent is an ineffective leader: as the members of the household don't respect him.

As soon as the Chief Executive Officer of Uber came under scrutiny for ignoring reports of sexual harassment, he lost the respect of the board of directors and was removed from the company he created, this was a case of him losing respect because of his moral judgment. While respect is the primary factor in a leaders effectiveness should the leaders' moral judgment sway too far, the peers may still respect the leader for his past contributions, but acting in the best interest of the group, they must find a new leader, before they find themselves neck-deep in controversy.

It is for the simple reason when someone needs to execute your orders, they must respect you, or else they will do a halfhearted task, and as a leader, you have failed to lead them effectively.
It is not the dream of freedom that causes uprisings like the Arab Spring but a deep-rooted hatred and disrespect for our leaders.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 548, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...leader: as the members of the household dont respect him. As soon as the Chief Ex...
^^^^
Line 9, column 312, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...hile respect is the primary factor in a leaders effectiveness should the leaders moral ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, still, while, no doubt

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2077.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81902552204 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52816989642 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542923433875 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 47.0 23.0359550562 204% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.459108104 60.3974514979 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 230.777777778 118.986275619 194% => OK
Words per sentence: 47.8888888889 23.4991977007 204% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352083657322 0.243740707755 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143901561527 0.0831039109588 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909517140942 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149385895708 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0983040940015 0.0667264976115 147% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.2 14.1392134831 178% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 12.1743820225 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.0 11.8971910112 227% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 20.8 11.2143820225 185% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.