Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Without respect, the capabilities of a leader can be seriously undermined making them ineffective as such, therefore a leader's ability to maintain their peers' respect does take precedent over their sound moral judgment.
In order to lead effectively, leaders need to earn the respect of their peers. Respect often translates to trust, which is a necessity when leading. In history you can find many cases in which once leaders lost the respect of their peers or people, it was an omen of their downfall. Once they lost respect ergo trust, they lost their power. If their peers can trust in them, then their power as a leader is greatly amplified. The decisions of a leader who is respected ergo trusted will most surely be met with support and not resistance. This in turns allows for whatever system they are governing to operate smoothly - not losing time or effort to mediate bureaucratic backlash which could be the case if the leader were not respected.
It can be conceded that sound moral judgment is an important trait in and often itself, in fact in some cases, it is the characteristic of leader that garners them respect. However, as it does not always do so, it is not the critical component necessary in order to lead successfully. In fact expressing what would be recognized as a reasonable moral judgment call could in fact precipitate a loss of respect if the leader's peers do not agree with it or have other motives. Therefore sound moral judgment is not necessarily the key to an effective leader.
Thus the respect of a leader's peers is more essential to the foundation of a great leader than sound moral judgment. Their choices as a leader will be bolstered by the fact their peers' respect them. The support that leads to is invaluable as a leader and thus a leader's ability to maintain their peers' respect is highly important in comparison to their sound moral judgment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the comp 23
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 66
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 50
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 58
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting yo 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...g them ineffective as such, therefore a leaders ability to maintain their peers respect...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ot agree with it or have other motives. Therefore sound moral judgment is not necessarily...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...rily the key to an effective leader. Thus the respect of a leaders peers is more ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 264, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...to is invaluable as a leader and thus a leaders ability to maintain their peers respect...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, in fact, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1573.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 327.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81039755352 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65149092952 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470948012232 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9083708463 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.866666667 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.13333333333 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355590542425 0.243740707755 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143191585235 0.0831039109588 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940171243229 0.0758088955206 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241434014615 0.150359130593 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453723016258 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.