Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
A leader is the person who inpires many around them and people often find themselves emulating the behaviour of tehir leaders.The prompt suggests that a leader should be able to judge people based on their morals, but irrespective of that, a true leader should be able to maintain a respected atmosphere for them. I agree with the suggestion due to the following three reasons.
Firstly, regardless the character of a person a true leader should be able to maintain respect for his or her peers. Because how a person maintains other's respect is often reflective of their own moral values.For instance, if a person is behaving in an unethical manner within a team and it is observed by the leader. In such a situation if leader tries to downgrade them in from of everyone by sevearly castigating them publicaly, then it will also create a bad impact for the leader himself within the team. As people will often feel intimidated by them, therefore more than judging by moral value he should try to create a comfortable environment within the team.
Secondly, the attitude of people is highly affected by the peers or people around them.There is a saying, that, if you want to know about someone's true character, then look at the character of their friends. Hence, a leader should definitely be able to judge a person's character, it is often observed that people who might reflect a great moral character in one situation may behave differently in another.Therefore, making a judgement based solely on one situtation can create a sphere where evreyone may come out as moraly corrupt. And if respect isn't maintained in such a scenarioo then it can turn out as a disaster for the entire team.
Furthermore, it has been observed that morally corrupt people tend to become more sincere and genuine if given a second chance. If a person is caught in action of maintaining unethical behavior and irrespective of that they are respected by their peers, it does work towards improving their behaviour in the long run. For instance, if a person in the team is trying to portray their peers in negative light to present themselves as saint and a team player, this should immediately be cought by a true leader.Neverthless, if that employee is confronted for this kindof activity by the leader himself and still maintain their respect within peers, he may change his tactics. Therefore phsycology plays an crucial role in how a person behaves and conducts themselves in a team.
In conclusion, a great leader is the one who can judge people by moral values but tarnishing one's respect on the basis of that judgement can result in a great failure not only for the team but also for the leader himself.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...mulating the behaviour of tehir leaders.The prompt suggests that a leader should be...
^^^
Line 2, column 117, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... maintain respect for his or her peers. Because how a person maintains others respect i...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 209, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...en reflective of their own moral values.For instance, if a person is behaving in an...
^^^
Line 2, column 247, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an unethical manner" with adverb for "unethical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...s.For instance, if a person is behaving in an unethical manner within a team and it is observed by the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...cted by the peers or people around them.There is a saying, that, if you want to know ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...er should definitely be able to judge a persons character, it is often observed that pe...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 406, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...ation may behave differently in another.Therefore, making a judgement based solely on one...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 549, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...e out as moraly corrupt. And if respect isnt maintained in such a scenarioo then it ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 508, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Neverthless
... immediately be cought by a true leader.Neverthless, if that employee is confronted for thi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 673, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ithin peers, he may change his tactics. Therefore phsycology plays an crucial role in how...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 700, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...his tactics. Therefore phsycology plays an crucial role in how a person behaves an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2229.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 462.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82467532468 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81302435357 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458874458874 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 695.7 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0359550562 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.8999477323 60.3974514979 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.214285714 118.986275619 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 23.4991977007 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 5.21951772744 185% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199397794775 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796850534671 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057008965909 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128017016732 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415513764711 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 14.1392134831 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 48.8420337079 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 11.2143820225 136% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.