As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
times new Roman", times, serif; font-size: 21px;">The problem-solving ability of human beings is part of an evolutionary process with incremental improvements. The earliest homo sapiens were surely not equipped to solve many of the dire problems we are tackling today. Moreover, technological advancements are the results of our efforts to transform perfunctory steps in problem-solving into a structured and efficacious entity. Hence, reliance on technology does not impede our thinking ability, rather, it adds new dimensions to our thoughts and subsequently helps us garner creative solutions.
times new Roman", times, serif; font-size: 21px;">today technology has created new avenues and broadened our world view. Compared to any time in the history of the human race, scientific progress is unprecedented in this century. For comparison, we can look back to times when computing devices, an inseparable part of our lives today, were not invented. surely, the people still needed to perform calculations, keep records of their finances and perform business activities, although, in a relatively limited scope. it is easy to imagine the hardship they had to undergo with each step of their scaling up. although we might not be doing tedious calculations and keeping historic records in stacks of papers, it cannot be ascertained that our problem-solving ability has deteriorated. In contrast, the rate of innovation is at its peak today.
times new Roman", times, serif; font-size: 21px;">problem-solving skills and thinking ability constitutes a diverse array of parts. The functions and tasks, which were once part of our to-do list, that we have successfully devolved to machines, have freed us cognitive resources that we can deploy in our arenas of problem-solving. These additions of cognitive resources have presented us with new opportunities, increased innovation and the surge of scientific breakthroughs. For example, the human genome project which requires a significant amount of computation power to understand the intricate details of our genetical structure, would not have been considered possible just a few centuries ago. technology and our reliance on it is an enhancement, an inevitable part of evolution, and not a replacement for our thinking abilities.
times new Roman", times, serif; font-size: 21px;">human beings have an innate desire to solve problems and create meaningful change around him/her. this desire has propelled us to create technology that has eased our life, increased security, opened up new opportunities in business and led us to explore the furthest corners of the universe. although, the downsides of many inventions, starting from their pernicious effect on our health to the degradation of the environment, has time and again led us to question whether technology is a bane or boon. Nevertheless, the best possible ways to tackle those downsides were also presented by people equipped with advanced technologies. today, people strive to solve problems in the field of climate change, astronomy, medicine, etc, which would not have seen the light of the day without the technologies that empower us. surely, technology has not deteriorated our problem solving and thinking skills, rather enhanced it by equipping us with sophisticated tools that have positively multiplied our cognitive ability.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Times
times new Roman', times, serif; font-siz...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Times
... helps us garner creative solutions. times new Roman', times, serif; font-siz...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Surely
... of our lives today, were not invented. surely, the people still needed to perform cal...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 528, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...lthough, in a relatively limited scope. it is easy to imagine the hardship they ha...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Times
... of innovation is at its peak today. times new Roman', times, serif; font-siz...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 713, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Technology
...ered possible just a few centuries ago. technology and our reliance on it is an enhancemen...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Times
...lacement for our thinking abilities. times new Roman', times, serif; font-siz...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...reate meaningful change around him/her. this desire has propelled us to create techn...
^^^^
Line 7, column 354, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...e the furthest corners of the universe. although, the downsides of many inventions, star...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 695, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Today
...le equipped with advanced technologies. today, people strive to solve problems in the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, for example, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2888.0 2235.4752809 129% => OK
No of words: 509.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67387033399 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42582141522 2.79657885939 123% => OK
Unique words: 272.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534381139489 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 901.8 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3104942963 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.272727273 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1363636364 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149388698435 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502037071498 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332639740065 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108676201325 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279743433531 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.1392134831 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 48.8420337079 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.1639044944 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.38706741573 114% => OK
difficult_words: 155.0 100.480337079 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.