Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won’t benefit their future careers.
Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree. Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your position could be challenged.
Selecting subjects for undergraduate students is not as big of a deal as even after classes have started, many students end up ruminating over their decision of choosing specific subjects for a long time. Choosing a subject is not a fixed process with strict deadlines and various colleges still allow students to change their selected subjects or even change entire fields after few months of trying it. Prompt suggests that for students majoring in buiseness and Science, no subjects of humanities should be required in the curriculum. I strongly agree with this suggestion due to the following three reasons.
To begin with, a student gets an opportunity to learn all the subjects (a blend of science, buisness and humaninties) prior to undergraduation. During this period of learning, students get to develop their knowledge in a much broader light. This in turn helps them to assess various fields of their interests and select that one field that they want to persue furthur in undergraduation. This helps them be aware of all the subjects and develop an expertese in area of their interest. Demanding students to select any other subjects at this stage will create a system where everyone is studying everything and no one is an expert in one field. For instance, if doctors in medical school are made to chose a subject related to history, we can imagine how a student who is sound in bilogy can end up struggling history in due to the huge diffenrence in the two fields. This will not only add to additional stress on the student but may also hamper the development of student in subjects of their choice if time is not managed well.
Further, it is not just that humanitie's courses will not benefit students in future career but also studying for different sujects that are not related to their majors will impact the grades negatively for many students. For instance, a student who is studying for buiseness will have to spend more number of hours to understand any subject related to politics due to the difference in the curriculum of both. Either this will be the case of in other scenario the students might not take such sujects seriosly as they wil not contribute to their careers.Both ways it will impact their score badly, so not studyuing a subject is better during uncergraduation than studying it iwth half heart.
Some people may argue that students need to have knowledge of all the fields, be it humanities or buiseness or science.But isn't this the same reason that we are all taught all the fields together in primary school. In conclusion, as the level of education increases students need to focus on a narrow field and develpe their expertese in that particular subject only, otherwise we might never be able to get the most expert scientists or buiseness owners we see today,
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 403, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'prompts'?
Suggestion: Prompts
...re fields after few months of trying it Prompt suggests that for students majoring in ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 122, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...t humanities or buiseness or scienceBut isnt this the same reason that we are all ta...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, well, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2297.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 479.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79540709812 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67825486995 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64433835042 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46764091858 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 711.0 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.2370786517 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 479.0 23.0359550562 2079% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 60.3974514979 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2297.0 118.986275619 1930% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 479.0 23.4991977007 2038% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 79.0 5.21951772744 1514% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 10.2758426966 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171565776659 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171565776659 0.0831039109588 206% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0758088955206 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109352993498 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344398163797 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 240.7 14.1392134831 1702% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -406.25 48.8420337079 -832% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.92365168539 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 188.9 12.1743820225 1552% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.04 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 30.33 8.38706741573 362% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 11.8971910112 462% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 193.6 11.2143820225 1726% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 189.0 11.7820224719 1604% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.