In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should be required to step down after five years.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Power can be lethal to most of the people. Having the power to control the society in favor of their taste can be very compelling and hard to forget which is why it is important for those who have power to always keep in mind to be cautious. Whether the power falls into whom's hand would be a more crucial problem than whether they should step down after five years. I believe that it is up to the person who has power, to always bear conscience and not exploit their power regardless of the duration of five years.
For some people, knowing that five years is there maximum duration to hold on to power might be more poisonous. They would exploit power and try to achieve anything they had always dreamed of soon as they first take power, because knowing that there is an end can make people more desperate. For example, the former United States president, Donald Trump knew that he might not have a second chance of winning the power, so he exploited it to alter the policy without having no concern with other nation's safety. He tackled the immigrant policy and tried to save the welfare of United State citizens by degrading the welfare of people from other nations. Many experts predict that regardless of the five years duration, he would have done the same thing because it is up to the conscience and humanity of the person who is using power to decide how to use it.
Furthermore, not all people who had power for more than five years turned out to be malign. There were actually many people who tried their best to use power for good will without exploiting it. For instance, there is Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Junior, and so on. They all had the power to change the nation but they had the resistance to exploit power. Instead, they decided to use a peaceful way of altering the nation to be a better place to live without hurting other people. This is of course extremely difficult, which is why we still respect and admire their minds, but nonetheless, this still proves that there are people who can use power to make the world a better place even after five years.
To sum up, I do not think it is essential to have those who have power, to step down after five years. I believe it is up to their conscience and humanity to use power to make the world a better place. Just like the famous idiom, if the power falls into a person with bad will, it would be exploited in malign ways but if it falls into a good person, it would help people live better. .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 385, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rson, it would help people live better. .
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, if, nonetheless, second, so, still, for example, for instance, of course, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2016.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 456.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42105263158 5.05705443957 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15966536408 2.79657885939 77% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.44298245614 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 640.8 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3157849795 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166459135386 0.243740707755 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668814292113 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041587819879 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120553130113 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317323863396 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 48.8420337079 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 12.1639044944 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.