In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.
To accomplish the fruitful results one need to be laborious in their work. Any work cannot achieve success without any efforts. If we consider the issue also states the same. In any arduous task one can give a proficient contribution by considering the previous achievements. This can help the individual such a way that he reconsiders the task performed the way it lead to a success. By doing so one can perform the forthcoming work in a more better way and forestall if any problems occur. The influence of past achievement plays a vital role in the contribution of the present task. One can add the previous tricks and more new ones that leads to another success in his or her particular field.
Consider, the example of business field where the executives check their past records and plan according to them. And implements the new tasks with anomalous techniques. Another example, the IT sectors where the software development takes every day to day itself. Here the programmers implement a new program from the previous executions and correct if there are any bugs. Even just by rectifying the past mistakes one can traced towards the success. The individual must be meticulous about their past success even though it had lead to success, because the contribution of it lead to future achievement.
Secondly, if we see not only by retreating the previous success one need to more conscious about their prevailing tasks. Need to exaggerate the situation to its best outcomes. Not all the issues depend on the previous achievements some needed to be handled separately from their past records which leads to the different approach from their previous one. New methodologies
tend to the high quality of creativity. That enhances the person ability to tackle any kind of task with audacious manner.
Conclusively, I would say that it is not possible to produce a significant contribution unless the previous achievement is
taken into consideration. Meanwhile, one need to be more effective to adapt themselves to the new mannerisms that lead to
increase their creative capacity.
- The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial:“The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangere50
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.41
- In any field of endeavor, it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field.16
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making.10
- Science is meaningless without religion.58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ot achieve success without any efforts. If we consider the issue also states the s...
Line 1, column 367, Rule ID: IT_VBZ
Message: Did you mean 'leads'?
...considers the task performed the way it lead to a success. By doing so one can perfo...
Line 1, column 440, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
...e can perform the forthcoming work in a more better way and forestall if any problems occur...
Line 2, column 187, Rule ID: DT_PRP
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
... anomalous techniques. Another example, the IT sectors where the software development ...
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...ution unless the previous achievement is taken into consideration. Meanwhile, one...
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'while', 'kind of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.212365591398 0.240241500013 88% => OK
Verbs: 0.145161290323 0.157235817809 92% => OK
Adjectives: 0.102150537634 0.0880659088768 116% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0483870967742 0.0497285424764 97% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0564516129032 0.0444667217837 127% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.0940860215054 0.12292977631 77% => OK
Participles: 0.0241935483871 0.0406280797675 60% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.91718556254 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0537634408602 0.030933414821 174% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.134408602151 0.0997080785238 135% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0215053763441 0.0249443105267 86% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0161290322581 0.0148568991511 109% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2086.0 2732.02544248 76% => OK
No of words: 344.0 452.878318584 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.06395348837 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.58838876751 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.343023255814 0.366273622748 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.296511627907 0.280924506359 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.220930232558 0.200843997647 110% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.154069767442 0.132149295362 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91718556254 2.79330140395 104% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 219.290929204 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540697674419 0.48968727796 110% => OK
Word variations: 58.3495299164 55.4138127331 105% => OK
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6194690265 102% => OK
Sentence length: 16.380952381 23.380412469 70% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1580171199 59.4972553346 59% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3333333333 141.124799967 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.380952381 23.380412469 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.380952380952 0.674092028746 57% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.94800884956 141% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 46.0321151717 51.4728631049 89% => OK
Elegance: 1.32258064516 1.64882698954 80% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197288986352 0.391690518653 50% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0824813924843 0.123202303941 67% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0504451780565 0.077325440228 65% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.562344193074 0.547984918172 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.220844080744 0.149214159877 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853584691846 0.161403998019 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475044457221 0.0892212321368 53% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.246402048349 0.385218514788 64% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.187159549532 0.0692045440612 270% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118495457246 0.275328986314 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612078808155 0.0653680567796 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.4325221239 125% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30420353982 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 11.0 7.22455752212 152% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 7.0 2.70907079646 258% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.