Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Successful leaders tend to analyse the opinions thoroughly before supporting them. Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion is considered callow and has an image of not being able to take own's stand. For several reasons these leaders accomplish much less than they could have.
To begin with, Frequently changing decisions hinder growth in any sector. As, before any implementation of previous decision is complemented, introducing new change results in loss in terms of cost, time and labor.
Moreover, people's reliability in judgement of leaders is lost if they keep changing their mind, which in turn results in abject failure. Mercurial attitude thus leads to the demise of trust, which public has incorporated in any leader.
Additionally, people's illusion of leader's ability of having clear goals and determined plan is effaced. In-determination leads to vague attempts at alleviating the exacerbated problems of citizens. Take for an example, In North Korea, there is a rife paucity of education ,food and basic needs life, but the leader's misapprehension of pursuing greatness in capabilities of war attracts censure internationally.
However, there are circumstances when sagacious leaders have to consider popular opinions which change frequently. If the changes address imminent critical issues, then the leaders accumulate accolades instead of censure.Take for an example, the changes in Reserve Bank Of India's (RBI) policies during recent demonetization, almost around 90 mandates were issued during a period of 50 days depending on feedback from consensus to address the problems of cash crunch. Frequent changes in policies were severely criticized but the prime minister, Mr.Narendra Modi was categorically supported by the citizens.
Conclusively, sage decisions need patience and profound brainstorming before approaching any conclusion. Only then a leader can hope to be appreciated for his work. Merely following the will of influential factors does not pave the path to success for anyone.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 272, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ea, there is a rife paucity of education ,food and basic needs life, but the leade...
^^
Line 6, column 309, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...ion ,food and basic needs life, but the leaders misapprehension of pursuing greatness i...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 222, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Take
...accumulate accolades instead of censure.Take for an example, the changes in Reserve ...
^^^^
Line 8, column 547, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Narendra
...y criticized but the prime minister, Mr.Narendra Modi was categorically supported by the...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 33.0505617978 18% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 310.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63870967742 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10955025841 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664516129032 0.4932671777 135% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.0303241209 60.3974514979 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.25 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5625 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19616435313 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641100136286 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584751493893 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981852812891 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669872399874 0.0667264976115 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 48.8420337079 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.1639044944 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.98 8.38706741573 119% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.