When one thinks about the definition of a leader, the first thing that might come to mind is an ability of this individual to lead and influence others surrounding him or her. Undoubtedly, everyone has their own imagination about this term. However, most of the time people either describe a leader as a strong-minded person who is able not only to defend his own position on any specific topic but also convince others in his convictions, or claim an individual a leader when he or she supports the ideas of the popularity, perfectly manages with a public opinion, and can use it in his desirable way. This essay will look at both types of leadership, and at the end present a position that would be more reasonable and persuasive.
If one does research about the current leaders around the world, he will definitely find out the name of the Russian president within this list. “Why?” - may ask a person who is not interested in politics. “Because he is one of the most arrogant, self-confident, aggressive, and authoritarian rulers in the world arena”, - an amateur in this sphere could probably give a response. Unsurprisingly, Mr. Putin received such an opinion among the people because of his attitude and behaviour: he accomplishes the things which only he decides to be right, not the majority of the civil society nor the members of the parliament. For example, in 2016, on the internet people online participated in a survey in which they should have been to choose whether to live in a society where the minority groups, such as gays, lesbians, LGBT would be openly accepted or to prohibit them to reveal their true identities. As the results of the survey revealed, the majority tolerated and defended the rights of the individuals with uncommon characteristics. Unfortunately or fortunately, Mr. Vladimir Putin did not take the opinion of the majority of the population in mind and gave an interview to the press where he explained that results in the survey do not show a real proclivity of the all Russians because the old generation rarely uses high-tech technologies, and that the Russians are not yet ready for the Western tendencies. Such behaviour illustrates a leadership where a leader is not influenced by popular opinion.
On the other hand, supporting an opinion of the majority may result in positive consequences. In politics, such actions are often used by political parties before elections to attract more citizens to vote for them. For instance, in Central Asia politicians are well aware about the constitution of the population: ninety-five of the population are Muslim. That’s why, knowing this fact, they can maneuver the people, promising to build more mosques, and afterwards appealing for sympathy. Another example can be derived from the victory of the political party of the Green in Australia last year when they raised a question of the environment's survival after a numerous fire in forest areas in the country which even in far-located Mongolia people talked about. The Ukrainian president’s Mr. Zelenskiy victory can also be considered as an illustrative example when the leader shifted his mind in accordance with the opinion of the majority for the beneficence of all. All these examples are indicating a leadership when a leader takes into attention the opinion of the popularity.
Overall, the more people, the more opinions there are. It is really sophisticated to say what’s right or what’s wrong, what leader should or should not be. While one half of humanity would defend more stubborn and self-minded leaders, another half would support more democratic and flexible ones. After considering both sides, the author considers the type of the letter one more appealing due to the probability of usage of the majority’s opinion in an effective and advantageous way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
When one thinks about the definition of ...
^^^
Line 2, column 525, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he supports the ideas of the popularity, perfectly manages with a public opinion,...
^^
Line 6, column 633, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'environments'' or 'environment's'?
Suggestion: environments'; environment's
...year when they raised a question of the environments survival after a numerous fire in fores...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in an effective and advantageous way.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, look, may, really, so, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 87.0 58.6224719101 148% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3219.0 2235.4752809 144% => OK
No of words: 631.0 442.535393258 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10142630745 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.01195704033 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96221126641 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 332.0 215.323595506 154% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526148969889 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 1031.4 704.065955056 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.8290805258 60.3974514979 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.956521739 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4347826087 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21739130435 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139708033295 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0405079315262 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0317255086628 0.0758088955206 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0820519063354 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0325283755603 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 173.0 100.480337079 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.