Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may be proven false in the future

Essay topics:

Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may be proven false in the future

The author in the above issue suggest to mistrust any information consider as fact. I am totally in agreement with the author view. Thus, there seems no loop for the author view. There are multiple reason for my acceptances with the author view. I would like to state it in above paragraph.s
First of all, the author says to mistrust any information obtain as fact as in future it can be proved wrong. For example, few decades ago there was no existences of the life on the mars planet. As the advancement in the research took place, so the view for it also changed. Thus the piece of fact which gives information might be proven wrong tomorrow. Moreover, there are multiple reason to prompt my approval.
Secondly, the invention and advancement is the basic nature of the today’s generation. Human thinking never stop and the advancement in the technology will thus will lead way for the betterment of the individual. For example, disease like cancer were incurable previously. With the advancement, this disease has also become curable. Thus on the specific information of today, we cannot make conclusion for tomorrow. Thus due to above reason, I am in totally agreement with that of the author. However, a piece an information may lead to a fact. Moreover, it is easily said than it to be done. So to relate totally on the fact of today maybe dangerous of tomorrow.
Thirdly, during ancient age there where many myths which where consider as a matter of the fact are overcome in today’s generation. Thus there seems no disproval with the view of the author. Transformation is rule of the nature, so the with this transformation we cannot make sure to that of the future,
Further, I would like to wrap my discussion over this issue and bulk all above evidence. The fact of the information today can lead to the progression of the tomorrow. To trust on the specific information today is totally unreliable. As it might be proven wrong in tomorrow. Thus I am in completely acceptance with that of author.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 276, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...place, so the view for it also changed. Thus the piece of fact which gives informati...
^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
..., this disease has also become curable. Thus on the specific information of today, w...
^^^^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...we cannot make conclusion for tomorrow. Thus due to above reason, I am in totally ag...
^^^^
Line 4, column 137, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...re overcome in today's generation. Thus there seems no disproval with the view ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nformation today is totally unreliable. As it might be proven wrong in tomorrow. T...
^^
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...s it might be proven wrong in tomorrow. Thus I am in completely acceptance with that...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tely acceptance with that of author.
^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly', 'thus', 'for example', 'first of all']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.2425 0.240241500013 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.1225 0.157235817809 78% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0525 0.0880659088768 60% => OK
Adverbs: 0.07 0.0497285424764 141% => OK
Pronouns: 0.04 0.0444667217837 90% => OK
Prepositions: 0.1475 0.12292977631 120% => OK
Participles: 0.02 0.0406280797675 49% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.79974512303 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Infinitives: 0.03 0.030933414821 97% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.125 0.0997080785238 125% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0275 0.0249443105267 110% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.01 0.0148568991511 67% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2024.0 2732.02544248 74% => OK
No of words: 349.0 452.878318584 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7994269341 6.0361032391 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.58838876751 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.300859598854 0.366273622748 82% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.229226361032 0.280924506359 82% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.183381088825 0.200843997647 91% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.131805157593 0.132149295362 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79974512303 2.79330140395 100% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 219.290929204 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.43553008596 0.48968727796 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 44.1070362743 55.4138127331 80% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6194690265 121% => OK
Sentence length: 13.96 23.380412469 60% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1299555615 59.4972553346 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.96 141.124799967 57% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.96 23.380412469 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.56 0.674092028746 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.21349557522 134% => OK
Readability: 36.8826361032 51.4728631049 72% => OK
Elegance: 1.76344086022 1.64882698954 107% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390078049233 0.391690518653 100% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.101715719919 0.123202303941 83% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0899514362953 0.077325440228 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.46807683739 0.547984918172 85% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.159054510607 0.149214159877 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147821981766 0.161403998019 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101343318601 0.0892212321368 114% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.490753330255 0.385218514788 127% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0378575523214 0.0692045440612 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.28661419135 0.275328986314 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827856024124 0.0653680567796 127% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.30420353982 151% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 7.22455752212 69% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.