In any profession — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
The statement suggests that leaders should take turns regularly in all fields by giving an exact time of five years. However, in my point of view, whether the benefit of changing leaders from time to time outweigh the drawback should be considered case-by-case.
In the democratic society, people are used to having elections on a regular basis. Election acts as an effective tool for people to supervise their leader. Even if the leader wins the election, it does not guarantee the next winning. Unless the leader work hard to represent the public's opinion, strive to make the great profit out of the society and keep improving the general welfare, people will consider to offer the next five years to the leader.
On the other hand, teachers and professors of great contributions seems to be those who devote years of life into their professions. No one would disagree with that knowledge is a steady accumulation of dedication. If leaders in the academic area need to step down every five years, there may be no enough time for them to realize their ideals and goals. Einstein has once said that success is one percent of inspiration and ninety-nine percent of aspiration. It gives ample evidence that his great theories are results of years of hard work.
Furthermore, in the business field, it's frequent to see a boss take office or step down. As the ultimate goal of a company is to earn the greatest revenue, it is vital and obvious that if a boss can lead the whole company to achieve that goal. If a boss is farsighted and competent, the employees will appreciate and likely to follow a ten-year or even fifty-year plan made by boss. Nevertheless, if a boss is reckless and selfish, five years will definitely be suffering for the employees.
In the final analysis, it is common and essential for people in power to take turns in political and business area, but whether five years is an appropriate time remains as a question. And for the educational field, changing leaders frequently may do harm to transmitting knowledge since that more time is needed on average for them.
- People s behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making62
- The following appeared in a memo from a budget planner for the city of Grandview It is time for the city of Grandview to stop funding the Grandview Symphony Orchestra It is true that the symphony struggled financially for many years but last year private 78
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition50
- In business education and government it is always appropriate to remain skeptical of new leaders until those leaders show that they are worthy of trust54
- Some people believe that success in creative fields such as painting fiction writing and filmmaking primarily requires hard work and perseverance Others believe that such success mainly requires innate talents that cannot be learned50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'publics'' or 'public's'?
Suggestion: publics'; public's
...s the leader work hard to represent the publics opinion, strive to make the great profi...
Line 3, column 400, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider offering'.
Suggestion: consider offering
...roving the general welfare, people will consider to offer the next five years to the leader. O...
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...itely be suffering for the employees. In the final analysis, it is common and ...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1739.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 359.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84401114206 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68471371135 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554317548747 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7345865744 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.294117647 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1176470588 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17647058824 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178788424944 0.243740707755 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514350507627 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051528869454 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.091309923494 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379526693174 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.