When it comes to the definition of “effectiveness”, people in general believe that doing things with the best solution within limited time, and that is “effectiveness”. In addition, quite a lot of people agree that a leader is a person who lead other people to a certain direction. Therefore, is the character of effectiveness that a leader should equip necessary? Or, is the quality of having highest ethical and moral standards that an effective leader must have?
To begin with, people have different viewpoints toward standards. In other words, standards vary in every mind of every human. From the cultural perspective, in my country, in order to have promising future of getting a well-paid career, merely maintaining at top of class is all people should do. This is because our domestic companies have tendency to hire students graduated from prestigious school. However, in other country, academic performance is not enough to enter well-known company. Practical skills such as internships or the ability to combine academic knowledge into developing useful tool are indispensable as well. As a result, the value of career preparation differs in every country, not to mention the “highest” ethical and moral standards.
Moreover, if a leader is lack of ethics or morality, yet the leader leads the public toward prosperous future, then the leader can be called as an “effective” leader.
On the contrary, if an effective leader has a better sense of ethics or morality, citizens could look up to their leaders. That is, citizens regard their effective leaders as their role model, who can not only lead the public to the promising future, but also have ethics and morality.
In conclusion, all the analysis points to an unmistakable perspective is that an effective leader do not necessarily have the highest ethical and moral standards.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 408, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'having the highest'.
Suggestion: having the highest
... equip necessary? Or, is the quality of having highest ethical and moral standards that an eff...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, in general, such as, as a result, in other words, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 299.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32107023411 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46897396686 2.79657885939 124% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561872909699 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.740449438202 270% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8009491791 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.066666667 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 5.21951772744 224% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183622322388 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671756693385 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612299516941 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125200683225 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440954066411 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.